Anonymous ID: cdbd47 Jan. 21, 2023, 10:43 a.m. No.18188637   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8653 >>9136 >>9159

Reposting this from end of LB. This is the most based and bad ass response to a climate change Karen that I’ve ever heard. Dan Pena destroys the whole notion of a climate change crisis in my humble but accurate opinion.

 

https://youtu.be/NjlC02NsIt0

Anonymous ID: cdbd47 Jan. 21, 2023, 10:44 a.m. No.18188641   🗄️.is 🔗kun

A Taiwan bloodbath might suit US decision-makers just fine

 

Wargames point to heavy losses in a conflict with China, but that’s unlikely to discourage America’s war advocates

 

Most sane human beings would shudder to think about the carnage that would result from a US-China war over Taiwan. For the warmongers and military-industrial-complex profiteers in Washington, the bloody prospects are something to contemplate and calculate with a mixture of anticipation and opportunism.

 

No matter how they run the various scripts, the computers and the human analysts spit out findings that ought to be sobering for policy makers and generals alike. Consider, for example, this month’s wargaming report by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a US think tank that considers its mission to be defining the “future of national security.”

 

CSIS studied 24 different scenarios for a US-China conflict following a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. The gist of its findings was that the invasion would fail, but at an enormous cost to all parties involved. The US and Japan would lose dozens of warships, including two American aircraft carriers, hundreds of planes and thousands of troops. Taiwan would be left in ruins, “without electricity and basic services.” The think tank sees the dust clearing with Beijing’s vaunted naval forces “in shambles,” hundreds of ships and aircraft lost, and tens of thousands of Chinese troops either dead or captured.

 

https://www.rt.com/news/570038-us-wargames-china-taiwan-war/

Anonymous ID: cdbd47 Jan. 21, 2023, 10:58 a.m. No.18188716   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18188688

Anyone who really thought about it and processed the mortality rate alone, which has remained steady at 0.2% encompassing all age groups, health statuses, & other demographics, would immediately understand there was no need for a vaccine in the first place. Why risk injecting oneself with a rushed and unknown technology at best, and, at worst (for those of us who are critical thinkers at least), a highly suspicious creation of the deep state?