Pic of Nagasaki.
How is it that the roads are clear? If they were bulldozed there would be large piles on the sides.
Obviously it was destroyed in a firestorm, not a nuclear blast that would have scattered debris over everything. The fact that a few buildings escaped unscathed also attests to the fact that there was no huge blast.
Do you live in CA?
Better hire a lawyer who specializes in evictions, and don’t harass crazy lady or the restraining order may be on you and sis in law
Look closer at the picrel. How are any buildings still standing then?
>>18205300 the nuclear hoax- Miles Mathis
https://fliphtml5.com/rwzh/mmoh
http://mileswmathis.com/trinity.pdf
The way a nuke blast has been presented is as a massive pressure wave, at whatever altitude, as well as a fireball. The pressure wave would hit first and blow everything apart. Maybe something would be left at the epicenter if you believe the official narrative, but at Hiroshima the only thing left is a concrete building. The roads all around are clear. If a nuke went off it would have blown debris over all the roads the roads are completely clear, not covered in ash from burned debris. There is no logical explanation except that the city was destroyed by a fire storm that burned everything in place and there was no blast pressure wave. No nuke.
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie/
Wagging the moon doggie: the most complete takedown of the moon landing hoax.
Saved the link thx