Anonymous ID: 4a00a1 Jan. 23, 2023, 5:31 p.m. No.18206490   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6496

>>18206479

> are mocking me for exercising my first amendment right.

No, I'm mocking you because you opened up in your first post with a raging whine. A REEEEEEEEEEEEE, if you will. The red text and all caps really was the cherry on top. Anons have never seen that before. Never. That tactic has never once been seen before so therefore you are totally genuine, right?

Anonymous ID: 4a00a1 Jan. 23, 2023, 5:34 p.m. No.18206510   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18206496

> you are criticizing me, NOT because of what I said, but because I used red text and all caps.

No, there seems to be a reading comprehension on your end. I said I was mocking you because, and I shall copypaste my own words here:

>I'm mocking you because you opened up in your first post with a raging whine. A REEEEEEEEEEEEE, if you will.

So, as you can see, that is what I'm mocking you for. Now I'm mocking you because you're displaying the reading comprehension of a pre-teen.

Anonymous ID: 4a00a1 Jan. 23, 2023, 6:46 p.m. No.18206946   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

It makes them so mad that they can't abuse the platform to silence those that make them look like fools, like they can on so many other platforms. Poor bastards. I feel a small measure of pity for them.

Anonymous ID: 4a00a1 Jan. 23, 2023, 7:14 p.m. No.18207137   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Now they're LARPing as Anons, trying to generate a consensus against the regular Anons of this board. So typical. A predictable regular rotation of tactics. Anons have seen it all before. Nothing new from them. The same old, same old. And they'll fail miserably and be demoralized by the end of the night for their repeated failure.