Why are they hiding this about Klaus Schwab and the WEF?

Redacted with Clayton Morris

Investigative journalist Johnny Vedmore (partner Whitney Webb)

A special project was set up at Harvard in 1950's called Kissinger's International Seminar. Klaus father, Eugene Schwab sent Klaus to Harvard from Germany and by invitation Klaus was accepted into the seminar in 1964. The program was set up by William Yandel Elliot who had been an advisor to six different presidents and a high ranking member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Kissinger was in charge of creating a program designed to train young global leaders.

In 1966 Humphrey Dorman of Harvard released in the NY Times preemptively that Kissinger's Seminar was funded by the CIA from 1960 - 1966 through American Friends of the Middle East, Kermit Roosevelt, the Farfield Foundation and the Asian Foundation. In the course Klaus was given two mentors, Herman Khan (described by some as a Dr. Strangelove) and John Kenneth Galbraith a teacher of JFK. (JFK made Galbraith Ambassador to India and thought highly enough of Galbraith to hope to make him Ambassador to Soviet Union.) John Kenneth Galbraith along with Otto van Hapsburg worked together on the creation of the European Management Symposium and would become the first Keynote Speakers in 1971. Two years later it became the European Management Forum and during the fall of the Soviet Union it would become the World Economic Forum.

Elliot https://www1.cmc.edu/pages/faculty/welliott/teachers/elliott.htm

Kahn https://www.rand.org/pubs/papers/P1888.html

Galbraith https://www.jfklibrary.org/asset-viewer/archives/JKGPP

Habsburg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_von_Habsburg

WEF history https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_First40Years_Book_2010.pdf

A Senate Investigation Has Been Launched Into Pfizer After Project Veritas’ ‘Bombshell’ Undercover Video

Project Veritas’ ‘bombshell’ video that uncovered that Pfizer was exploring intentionally mutating Covid strains to profit off future mRNA “vaccines” has now led to a Senate investigation.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) has fired off a letter to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla to explain the revelations in Project Veritas’ undercover video footage featuring Jordon Triston Walker, a Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planner.

“An investigative report suggests that Pfizer may be conducting gain-of-function research, which it dubs ‘directed evolution’ research to mutate the SARS-CoV-2 virus to create additional, more potent variants and vaccines to combat future variants,” Rubio’s office states. “This type of research, similar to gain-of-function research, has long been controversial, and is suspected to be the cause of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

The following is the letter to Dr. Albert Bourla, who has long made false claims about the Pfizer vaccines and their impact on public health.

cont…

https://beckernews.com/pfizergate-49186/

>>18234431

cont…

The following is the letter to Dr. Albert Bourla, who has long made false claims about the Pfizer vaccines and their impact on public health.

Dear Dr. Bourla:

I write in response to troubling reports on Pfizer’s intention to mutate the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) virus through gain-of-function, or “directed evolution,” as detailed by Pfizer Director of Research and Development, Jordan Walker. As has been proven time and time again, attempts to mutate a virus, particularly one as potent as COVID, are dangerous. If the claims detailed in the video are true, Pfizer has put its desire for profit over the concern of national and global health and must hold itself accountable.

In a video released by Project Veritas on January 25, 2023, Mr. Walker laid out Pfizer’s plans to develop new vaccines for future variants of COVID by mutating the virus through directed evolution, a process that uses protein engineering to impose natural selection on a living organism or other biological materials, including viruses. Though he claimed the research is currently “exploratory,” he detailed how the research would proceed, such as how scientists would inject the mutated viruses into monkeys and collect serial samples from other monkeys who are infected.

Whether it’s gain of function research, or selected structure mutations through directed evolution, as Mr. Walker claimed would occur, any effort to make a virus more transmittable and deadlier is careless and dangerous. Further, Mr. Walker stated that Pfizer is willing to engage in this dangerous research because COVID and its variants are “a cash cow” for the company and regulators will go easy on their efforts because a significant percentage of government officials aim to work for Pfizer and other biopharmaceutical companies and do not want to compromise their future job prospects.

As a company that claims to “innovate every day to make the world a healthier place,” these claims from your leadership charged with research and development are alarming. As the American people deserve to know, I request that you provide the following information:

1. What efforts is Pfizer currently, or planning to, engage in to mutate the SARS-CoV-2 virus?

1. Does Pfizer intend to continue mutating the SARS-CoV-2 virus through gain-of-function, or directed evolution research, with the purpose of creating new vaccines before the variant is present in the greater population?

1. Has Pfizer engaged with federal officials engaged regarding their plans to oversee this research? Please provide the names and agencies for these individuals.

1. What steps has Pfizer taken to ensure the mutated virus does not leak from the laboratory and infect the greater population?

1. Has Pfizer engaged with other biopharmaceutical companies to collaborate on this research effort? Please list the entities that you have been in contact with.

1. Will you commit to halting any future research that mutates the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine as substantial evidence has indicated that similar dangerous research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology very likely led to the initial emergence and global spread of the virus?

As a leader in global public health and development of the COVID vaccine, with American taxpayer dollars, it is critical that Pfizer is accountable for their actions and be transparent with the public on the substance and intent of their research.

https://beckernews.com/pfizergate-49186/

>>18234431

Directed Evolution - a method used in protein engineering that mimics the process of natural selection to steer proteins or nucleic acids toward a user-defined goal

Directed evolution (DE) is a method used in protein engineering that mimics the process of natural selection to steer proteins or nucleic acids toward a user-defined goal.[1] It consists of subjecting a gene to iterative rounds of mutagenesis (creating a library of variants), selection (expressing those variants and isolating members with the desired function) and amplification (generating a template for the next round). It can be performed in vivo (in living organisms), or in vitro (in cells or free in solution). Directed evolution is used both for protein engineering as an alternative to rationally designing modified proteins, as well as for experimental evolution studies of fundamental evolutionary principles in a controlled, laboratory environment.

[insert] An example of directed evolution with comparison to natural evolution. The inner cycle indicates the 3 stages of the directed evolution cycle with the natural process being mimicked in brackets. The outer circle demonstrates steps in a typical experiment. The red symbols indicate functional variants, the pale symbols indicate variants with reduced function.

History

Directed evolution has its origins in the 1960s[2] with the evolution of RNA molecules in the"Spiegelman's Monster"experiment.[3] The concept was extended to protein evolution via evolution of bacteria under selection pressures that favoured the evolution of a single gene in its genome.[4]

Lutz S (December 2010). "Beyond directed evolution–semi-rational protein engineering and design". Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 21 (6): 734–43. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.08.011. PMC 2982887. PMID 20869867.

Cobb RE, Chao R, Zhao H (May 2013). "Directed Evolution: Past, Present and Future". AIChE Journal. 59 (5): 1432–1440. doi:10.1002/aic.13995. PMC 4344831. PMID 25733775.

Mills DR, Peterson RL, Spiegelman S (July 1967). "An extracellular Darwinian experiment with a self-duplicating nucleic acid molecule". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 58 (1): 217–24. Bibcode:1967PNAS…58..217M. doi:10.1073/pnas.58.1.217. PMC 335620. PMID 5231602.

Hall BG (July 1978). "Experimental evolution of a new enzymatic function. II. Evolution of multiple functions for ebg enzyme in E. coli". Genetics. 89 (3): 453–65. doi:10.1093/genetics/89.3.453. PMC 1213848. PMID 97169.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed_evolution>>>18232655

>>18234475

Spiegelman's Monster - RNA replicase

Spiegelman's Monster is the name given to an RNA chain of only 218 nucleotides that is able to be reproduced by the RNA replication enzyme RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, also called RNA replicase. It is named after its creator, Sol Spiegelman, of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who first described it in 1965.

AN EXTRACELLULAR DARWINIAN EXPERIMENT WITH A

SELF-DUPLICATING NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULE*

BY D. R. MILLS,t R. L. PETERSON, AND S. SPIEGELMAN

DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, URBANA

Communicated May 18, 1967

Summary.–Experiments were performed to explore the evolutionary consequences for a self duplicating nucleic acid molecule put under selection pressure for fast growth. As the experiment progressed, the rate of RNA synthesis increased and the product became smaller. By the 74th transfer the replicating molecule had eliminated 83 per cent of its original genome, becoming the smallest known self-duplicating entity. Aside from their intrinsic interest, such studies can provide insight into a number of central issues. Thus, they can tell us the smallest self-duplicating entity which can be constructed by such devices and provide much simpler objects for analyzing the replication process. Further, the sequences involved in the recognition mechanism between template and enzyme are enriched in the smaller molecules which evolve. Finally, these abbreviated molecules have a very high affinity for the replicase but are no longer able to direct the synthesis of virus particles. This feature opens up a novel pathway toward a highly specific device for interfering with viral RNA replication.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed_evolution

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC335620/pdf/pnas00677-0236.pdf

World Mortality Watch

Mortality Watch aggregates mortality data from multiple sources to generate daily updated mortality charts. Select from 186 jurisdictions and many different chart types. The underlying dataset is the largest and most detailed on the web. Data and calculations (R language) are open source available on Github. Crude mortality rate (CMR) is deaths per one hundred-thousand residents. Age Standardized Mortality Rate (ASMR) is calculated using the WHO 2015 Standard Population.

https://www.mortality.watch/?q=%7B%22c%22%3A%5B%22Sweden%22%2C%22United+States%22%5D%2C%22cs%22%3A0%2C%22ct%22%3A8%2C%22t%22%3A4%2C%22m%22%3A0%7D