Anonymous ID: 931d7b Jan. 27, 2023, 11:21 a.m. No.18237440   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7447 >>7462

>>18237409

just do a search for night vision security camera footage. I am just selecting images I am finding from just a basic search. Infrared reacts differently it is not quite a negative. But maybe anons are jumping the gun on some of their theories right now just looking at how the technology works. They may be different which could be different shirt person etc. But It at least bears looking into

Anonymous ID: 931d7b Jan. 27, 2023, 11:23 a.m. No.18237449   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7459

>>18237447

not trying to fool you retard just looking up shit on the internet believe what you want. But the more you refuse to at least investigate the more I know you are pushing a narrative.

Anonymous ID: 931d7b Jan. 27, 2023, 11:26 a.m. No.18237467   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7480

>>18237459

Seems like you are. Not projection, just letting you know that this last reaction was all I needed to realize you are a dumb fag. Observation and experience seems to be failing you right now retard.

Anonymous ID: 931d7b Jan. 27, 2023, 11:28 a.m. No.18237486   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18237462

its not a negative some older camera used to do that, But unless we have an infrared specialist it appears to be the same person and outfit. While CGI could still be an option infrared lighting seems to be more plausible.