‘Good Morning America’ Hosts T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach Fired From ABC Following Extramarital Affair – Accusations of Drunkenness, Misconduct Fly!

Last month ABC removed “Good Morning America” hosts T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach from the show after reports of an ongoing affair between the two surfaced.

TMZ on Friday reported both T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach are OUT at ABC.

Accusations of misconduct and drunkenness are flying after a ‘contentious’ mediation session on Thursday.

TMZ reported:

T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach are both out at ABC … TMZ has learned.

Sources connected to the network tell us, after a marathon mediation session Thursday, ABC and the 2 ‘GMA3’ anchors have severed ties, and both will receive payouts per their contracts.

We’re told the mediation was “extremely contentious,” with ABC reps accusing both Amy and T.J. of various forms of misconduct, which one source characterized as “a witch hunt.”

We’re told one of the accusations is that Amy had liquor in her dressing room, which the ABC folks said was a violation of policy. One source called the accusation “ridiculous,” noting some of the bottles were sent from top ABC News execs. The source said those execs sent other on-air talent liquor as well, so this just looked like a way to justify getting rid of her.

We’re told another accusation was that Amy went to the College Football National Championship game a year ago, and came to work the next day drunk. One source called that “insane,” adding she was simply tired.

As for Amy and T.J., we’re told it became clear in mediation they did not handle their romance appropriately … waiting too long to disclose it to ABC execs. ABC also made it clear … their “behavior on set” was “uncomfortable” for some ABC staff.

Our sources say the mediation will continue as both sides negotiate the fine points of Amy and T.J.’s exit.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/good-morning-america-hosts-t-j-holmes-amy-robach-fired-abc-following-extramarital-affair-accusations-drunkenness-misconduct-fly/

Federal judge allows Capitol Police officers’ lawsuit against Trump for Jan 6 riot to proceed

Mehta cited an opinion he wrote in 2022 that arguments raised by Trump and other defendants were "in large part duplicative of those the court already considered and addressed."

A federal judge on Thursday refused to throw out a civil lawsuit against former President Donald Trump brought by Capitol Police officers for injuries they sustained during the riot on January 6, 2021, and is allowing the case to proceed.

US District Judge Amit Mehta rejected the claim by Trump that presidential immunity protected him from liability of actions as part of his official duties.

According to Bloomberg, Mehta cited an opinion he wrote in 2022 that arguments raised by Trump and other defendants were "in large part duplicative of those the court already considered and addressed."

The DC federal court judge’s previous decision rejected claims of immunity Trump raised to challenge similar lawsuits against him regarding the riot. In the previous decision, Mehta ruled Trump’s speech at a rally before the riot went beyond protections shielding presidents from civil liability while in office and provided by the First Amendment.

Mehta’s opinion on Thursday also ruled that the Capitol Police officers’ lawsuit could also move forward against several others including members of the Oath Keepers, Three Percenters, and the Proud Boys.

140 police officers were assaulted and over $2 million in property damage was caused during the riot.

However, the judge dismissed the police officers’ case against media personality Ali Alexander and political consultant Roger Stone ruling that their conduct was protected by the First Amendment.

https://thepostmillennial.com/federal-judge-allows-capitol-police-officers-lawsuit-against-trump-for-jan-6-riot-to-proceed

WHO releases updated list of 'critical medicines' for nuclear emergencies

New info for "vital preparedness and readiness tool."

The World Health Organization this week released an updated list of what it said are critical medicines necessary to have stockpiled in the case of a nuclear attack.

The WHO on Friday announced its updated "critical medicines list for radiological and nuclear emergencies," which it said supersedes a prior list from 2007.

“In radiation emergencies, people may be exposed to radiation at doses ranging from negligible to life-threatening. Governments need to make treatments available for those in need – fast,” said Maria Neira with the WHO's Healthier Population division

“It is essential that governments are prepared to protect the health of populations and respond immediately to emergencies," Neira said. "This includes having ready supplies of lifesaving medicines that will reduce risks and treat injuries from radiation.”

Among the materials the WHO said were necessary in the stockpile include stable iodine, used to "prevent or reduce the exposure of the thyroid to radioactive iodine," as well as "cytokines used for mitigation of damage to the bone marrow."

https://justthenews.com/world/who-releases-updated-list-critical-medicines-nuclear-emergencies

https://www.who.int/news/item/27-01-2023-who-updates-critical-medicines-list-for-radiation-and-nuclear-emergencies