FOCUS, right?
"Protect your DNA" Right?
I have a hypothesis and it directly relates to Jordon Walker. In 1986 vaccine makers got civil liability protection from harms caused by their products and a tax was placed on each vaccine to fund the "vaccine court" where people who manage to fight their way through get some small compensation. The entities doing the harm pay nothing. This means that if you make someone chronically ill you can extract further wealth from them via never ending medical care and pharmaceutical prescriptions. Fees paid to the FDA by drug makers fund a significant percentage of their operations, further meaning that the FDA itself has incentive to make sure new drugs are always in the pipeline getting approved. As Jordon admitted their is also a huge "revolving door" between Pharma and the FDA.
I dug in on vaccines prior to COVID and I had concluded that the whole process of vaccine development, marketing and surveillance was more like a bioweapons program than a "public health" activity. Since vaccines are not tested to the same standard as other pharmaceuticals there is tremendous incentive to market drugs as "vaccines" so as to simplify getting the product out there. I think this is one reason why effort was made to call the gene therapy injections "vaccines" though there were obviously other reasons, too.
Remember early on, how people wanted to base religious exemptions to taking the jabs on the issue of human aborted fetal cells being used in the development of the products? There is a lot of effort to hide this and again, I think I know at least one reason why. Consider cancer. You probably have heard that some cancers have gene mutations. Most people probably think these arise spontaneously due to radiation or chemical exposure and of course, that probably make some sense, just as it makes sense that occasionally an animal pathogen might be found to infect a person. However, I have noticed that at CDC ACIP meetings, where new vaccines are added to the vaccine schedules, it is common for a possible "signal" to be identified and then summarily be dismissed in order to monitor during "post marketing surveillance" (They are admitting here, I think to experimenting on the public, btw)
If a human vaccine were made with aborted fetal cells and actually contained DNA fragments with mutations, could that produce a plethora of cancers with similar mutation profiles? How easy might that make it to anticipate the new cancer drugs needed for continued massive pharmaceutical products?
There is a vaccine database called the "VSD" or vaccine safety datalink. In addition, EHRs allow surveillance of all health related information for each person going to conventional health care.
Using cancers as an example, if you could track a baby from birth via their newborn heel stick (to test for genetic diseases?!) and then look at their health status following their "required" vaccinations, mightn't you be able to figure out the mutations the various "vaccines" and their ingredients are causing? Could you start anticipating what particular cancers might become more common after your products do their work?
There is a lot more to this. Suffice it to say, it is probably worth it, in my opinion, to make sure that your children's DNA doesn't end up "tested" (like with those horrendous swabs). It is probably good to avoid ALL vaccines, again, in my opinion. Of course, do your own research. I am not a doctor (and I'm glad about it, too.)
Jordon Walker got us to think about tinkering with VIRUSES. I think we need to be even more concerned about how "they" are tinkering with US.
( Don't get me started on what "they" could be doing to our intelligence with those aluminum injections they give to newborns called "Hep B" vaccines.)
Sorry this was long. It will pertain to mRNA vaccines in profound ways, I think.