Anonymous ID: 438cfb Jan. 28, 2023, 6:19 a.m. No.18242158   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2193

https://www.wnd.com/2023/01/antifa-armed-instrument-permanent-democratic-establishment/

 

My question is if it is only the "Democratic establishment" or if it is also CCP infiltrators/collaborators, too. I doubt it's overtly "Republican" at all because it seems like antifa would hate Republicans. In any case, it would appear antifa is aligned with the corrupt establishment at this point and serves as some sort of militia on their behalf. Communist mercenaries in some way. maybe?

Anonymous ID: 438cfb Jan. 28, 2023, 6:29 a.m. No.18242189   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18242109

 

I did an entire personal dig on the NIH and a person named Mary Lasker a friend of Margaret Sanger's. If you look carefully at the history of the NIH you begin to grasp how we got to a place where a "vaccine" is literally a "bioweapon".

 

The Lasker Foundation is responsible for some awards that have been called the "American Nobel prizes". The Foundation has many, many ties to the NIH. It was founded by Albert and Mary Lasker. Albert Lasker being a prominent advertising executive and Mary being a collaborator with Margaret Sanger

 

https://laskerfoundation.org/celebrating-our-75th-anniversary/

 

Interestingly, a source I used back in 2020 to explore the connection between Mary Lasker and Margaret Sanger is now unavailable to my on line search.

Anonymous ID: 438cfb Jan. 28, 2023, 7:53 a.m. No.18242510   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/biden-issues-statement-bringing-race-death-tyre-nichols-despite-officers-black/

 

This story reminded me of an idea I've had for some time. What if the use of "racial" descriptions is not used to identify people by skin color but by identification with "good" v. "evil".

 

If it is about skin tones, how did Elizabeth Warren get away with saying she's a POC? If it's about "race" how is it that Bill Clinton was the "first black President"? If skin color makes one "white" or "black" how is it that the death of a "black" man at the hands of "black" officers is somehow about racial injustice?

 

People in America of African descent whose ancestors came here as slaves, did well until their families were torn apart by social policies. Democrat/establishment narratives about racism produce a rationalization for thuggery, which is then used by said establishment to keep their new "plantation" going.

 

I think a proper interpretation of BLM is not "Black Lives Matter" but "Evil/thug Lives Matter".

 

No one of any skin tone needs to live this way.