>>182442
We've already seen this BTW in the current media counter-narrative. "Where's the proof."
While the MSM Fake News is completely fine with quoting "anonymous sources" or "people familiar with X's thinking," will all of a sudden require absolute 100% full disclosure proof.
This means they will require to see highly sensitive documents that could jeopardize resources/agents currently working behind the scenes.
They know that this cannot be done in the name of national security and will thus conclude that the memo is a partisan document founded on unreliable intelligence.