'we'
if you have a personal agenda against a political person, why should a research board give a shit?
'we'
if you have a personal agenda against a political person, why should a research board give a shit?
and crickets . . .
well, it's obvious to me that a new team has festered right into place here.
they do a lot push posting and they always surround it with other posts that echo the same thing, supposedly by other people.
for example they do the 'brain warfare' and then someone eolse, right abouve talks about 'my brain'.
it is not organic.
the board seem occupied by people who follow the rules of 'push' and 'narrative' but have no love in their hearts. They are here to push a point of view and could care less who is here to read it.
NO NAMEPHAGS!
and yet you keep up the marketing campaign
clearly I'm tired of the amature push-narrative of the timid new-team shills
you could have made that clear.
I thought it was new-shill
whatever, it's not about that, or whoever it is: it is about the name-dropping behavior os 'chatter-shilling' like what Scientologists do in the city when they are trying to get new rubes they do a 'whisper' thing so passers by can hear it .
it's annoying.