I wonder if these US laws quoted in the book are still intact, and if so, perhaps they can be used to fight Pharma & Government today?

Pasteur was a patsy of Pharma in France, he was the worst scientist ever, real scientists such as Bechamp, proved he was a fraud.Pharma today has revealed that all of the statements in the book are true, it has ultimately become the most evil tyranny ever. (book attached 32 pages, written originally in the 1920's)

The Dream & Lie of Louis Pasteur

by R. B. Pearson (originally Pasteur, Plagiarist, Imposter 1942)

Quotes and laws on inoculations in the early 1900's

The Danger of Inoculating

After discussing the practice of medicine in the past and saying that since Jenner's and Pasteur's days the modern effort is to make sick well, he says of inoculations:

"When a drug is administered by the mouth, as was beautifully pointed out by Dr J. Garth Wilkinson, in proceeding along the alimentary canal it encounters along its whole line a series of chemical laboratories, wherein it is analysed, synthesized, anddeleterious matter prepared for excretion, and finally excreted, or it may be ejected from the stomach, or overcome by an antidote.

But when nature's coat of mail, the skin, is violated, and the drug inserted beneath the skin, nature's line of defence is taken in the rear, and rarely can anything be done to hinder or prevent the action of the drug, no matter how injurious, even fatal it may be. All the physicians of the world are incompetent either to foresee its action or to hinder it. Even pure water has been known to act as a violent and foudroyant poison when injected into the blood stream. How much more dangerous is it, then, to inject poisons known to be such, whether modified in the fanciful manner at present fashionable among Vivisectionists or in any other manner. These simple considerations show thatinoculation should be regarded as malpracticeto be tolerated only in case of extreme danger where the educated physician sees no other chance of saving life.

The Germ Theory Fetish

Now the forcing of these inoculations upon individuals by law is one of the worst of tyrannies imaginable, and should be resisted,even to the death of the official who is enforcing it. English speaking people need to have ideals of liberty refreshed by a study of the history of Wat Tyler, who headed one of the most justifiable rebellions in history, and although treacherously murdered by the then Lord Mayor of London, his example should be held up to all our children for imitation …"

But revenous a nos monutous; the entire fabric of the germ theory of disease rests upon assumptions which not only have not been proved, but which are incapable of proof, and many of them can be proved to be the reverse of truth. The basic one of these unproven assumptions, the credit for which in its present form is wholly due to Pasteur, is the hypothesis that all the so called infectious and contagious disorders are caused by germs, each disease having its own specific germ, which germs have existed in the air from the beginning of things, and that though the body is closed to these pathogen's germs when in good health, when the vitality is lowered the body becomes susceptible to their inroads."

I agree most heartily with Dr Leverson's statement that "the forcing of these inoculations upon individuals by law is one of the worst tyrannies imaginable, and should be resisted even to the death of the official who is enforcing it." Strong words, but absolutely right!

Professor F. W. Newman of Oxford University has said:

"Against the body of a healthy man Parliament has no right of assault whatever under pretence of the public health; nor any the more against the body of a healthy infant.To forbid perfect health is a tyrannical wickedness, just as much as to forbid chastity or sobriety. No lawgiver can have the right. The law is an unendurable usurpation, and creates the right of resistance."

And Blackstone says: "No laws are binding upon the human subject which assault the body or violate the conscience."

In the case of the Union Pacific Railway vs Botsford, the United States Supreme Court said: "… no right is held more sacred or is more carefully guarded by the common law than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestioned authority of law.

As well said by Judge Cooley: "The right of one's person may be said to be aright of complete immunity; to be let alone." (Cooley on Torts 29)

In 1903 Judge Woodward of the New York Appellate Court said in the Viemeister case: "It may be conceded that the legislature has no constitutional right to compel any person to vaccination." (84 N.Y. Supp. 712)

http://whale.to/a/b/pearson.html

Books concerning smallpox vaccination Smallpox (boot attached)

THE GOLDEN CALF AN EXPOSURE OF VACCINE-THERAPY

a book BY CHARLES W. FORWARD

T. H. Huxley once met Herbert Spencer in the Athenaeum. Wearing a lugubrious expression Spencer remarked, " Oh, Huxley, there's been a tragedy in my house this morning." Without waiting to hear its nature Huxley at once retorted, "Oh, I know what has happened. A beautiful scientific theory has been killed by one nasty inconvenient fact."

" Gullible, however, by fit apparatus, all Publics are, and gulled with the most surprising profit." Carlyle, Sartor Resartus.

Second Edition

Preface

From the day in the early eighties when I paid a visit to Pasteur at his laboratory in the rue d'Ulm, I have been impressed by two things—the lack of anything like convincing evidence that infectious disorders are caused by specific germs, and the extraordinary success with which the so-called " germ " theory has been exploited commercially.

My hesitancy to accept this theory and all that is involved in it is based more upon the equivocations, contradictions, divergencies of opinion and (sometimes unintentional) admissions of its protagonists than upon any criticisms levelled against it by its adversaries. I have been impressed, too, by the apparent levity (amounting at times to callousness) with which treatments more fraught with serious danger to the patient than anything dreamed of in the Middle Ages are applied, and, indeed, forced upon adults and young children. I find, moreover, within the ranks of the profession, and particularly in the realm of surgery serious misgivings upon these matters, which is not surprising in view of the many disasters which have followed in the wake of vaccine-therapy and the conflict of opinion amongst those who pose as authorities thereon.

Such scepticism, however, though expressed at times with considerable force, is sporadic. It does not come to the knowledge of the general public, and may even escape the notice of the busy professional man.

On the other hand, those individuals who amass fortunes by the manufacture and sale of vaccines and serum find it worth their while to carry on a continuous campaign by bombarding every medical practitioner whose name appears on the Register with printed matter extolling the virtues of their questionable products and influencing the minds of the public by announcements in the news columns of sensational " triumphs " in the " war " against disease ; of some new germ discovered; or some new vaccine concocted.

The material I have got together, though it represents a good deal of work is incomplete in many respects, but most of the authoritative opinions I have quoted are reasoned arguments not easily to be controverted, whilst the selection of facts and figures, small as it necessarily is owing to the limits of space, will afford food for reflection.

The death-rate of children from the effects of vaccination—actually higher than the death-rate from smallpox—the appalling disasters at Dallas, Bundaberg, Medellin, Baden (near Vienna), Bridgwater, Concord, Madrid and Lubeck have already recoiled upon the Medical Profession and lowered its prestige in the public estimation.

Reference is made in Chapter 4 to the remarkable extent to which the officials of the Ministry of Health appear to go out of their way to push the use of vaccines, insulin and other doubtful and dangerous forms of treatment. This is a phenomenon which merits investigation. A similar remark applies to the League of Nations Health Committee, upon which there appear to be too many " delegates " with special axes to grind.

And, finally, let me say that The Golden Calf is in no sense intended to be an attack upon the Medical Profession. It has been my privilege to number amongst my personal friends many members of that noble profession. I should be doing less than justice if I failed to remark upon the unselfish devotion to duty and the high standard of public spirit characteristic of the profession as a whole.

The candour of many whose comments appear in the following pages is in itself a testimony to their honesty of purpose.

It is to be feared, however, that in this age of commercialism and bureaucracy, the doctor has been manoeuvred into a false position and made somewhat of a " catspaw " of by the manufacturing chemists and the so-called " Institutes " which make huge profits from the sale of vaccines and similar products. (See Chap. 4.) If this work, by enlightening the more intelligent of the public, should prove helpful in indicating a way out of this impasse, it will not have been written in vain.

CHARLES W. FORWARD. Wimbledon, 1932.

LONDON:

JOHN M. WATKINS

21 CECIL COURT, CHARING CROSS ROAD, W.C.2

1933

http://whale.to/v/golden_calf.html