>>18270391

I think so.

An intelligent (as-in wise) ‘controller’ of AI would NOT want it to exclude ANY information… unless the ‘controller’ was trying to make the AI reach an already-envisioned Ends.

>>18270425

>>18270473

Agreed.

Adoration for Rush is most often blind

>>18270908

Same answer

why not both?

>>18270928

If the Ayys are working with the “intelligence community”, then the Ayys are stupid.