I have a hypothesis about "testing for bird flu". Do chickens generally have the desirable anti-spike antibody if they haven't been exposed to the spike protein in some manner? If this is something they acquire through exposure could it be possible that "the authorities" are using testing to identify flocks that might be producing the protective antibody and particularly emphasizing their destruction? With vaccinated humans being "spike protein factories" it is only a matter of time before all lifeforms around us are exposed, too, correct? Meaning that unless all chickens everywhere are culled or made so they don't lay eggs eventually we, and they, should be protected, right?
Well, duh. Though I did wonder if it wouldn't start until the "unvaccinated" code was put into place.
What we really should be asking in addition is: How long has vaccination v medical care use been tracked overall?
I've been wondering if metal detoxification would help with this. Specifically if removing aluminum from the brain would reduce seizures. My logic is like this: Epilepsy seems to follow exposures to vaccines. Aluminum containing vaccines might result in aluminum in the brain as has already been shown to be true in autism. Perhaps aluminum in the brain instigates "short circuits (I don't know if this is true or not.). There are acceptable ways to reduce brain aluminum such as drinking mineral waters with silica (you can make your own.)
For people with Alzheimer's disease or occupational exposure to aluminum with early dementia it seems that using silicated mineral water helps.
Idk, if it would be any use in cases of epilepsy, however.
>Bill Gates wants to take the chicken out of the equation
Chickens make antibodies in their egg yolks that could possibly help protect humans from "spike proteins". No wonder Bill doesn't like them.
I think the answer is "yes". However, I'm trying to figure out if the chicken needs exposure to "spike protein" to begin to make the antibodies.