Anonymous ID: 5d91c4 Feb. 2, 2023, 1:52 p.m. No.18272142   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2145

>>18272128

> Reasons to bake early graphic

Ty, anon fren.

Somehow, I feel like I read this in the notables at some point, but I'm too lazy to scroll up and check if it's there now. Hadn't considered everything on the list, ty anon.

Anonymous ID: 5d91c4 Feb. 2, 2023, 2 p.m. No.18272197   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2219 >>2228

>>18272146

> Wall of notes the primary issue

Walls of txt never really bothered me, just made it easier to go through old notables. I thought it was a combination of too-many-notes combined with too-much-refresh. My bad.

>>18272156

> Moar

They've always timed their exposes to crescendo with one another. Of course there is moar. Hope somebody from the CDC whistleblows, maybe gets some kind of domestic immunity deal for their family.

Anonymous ID: 5d91c4 Feb. 2, 2023, 2:07 p.m. No.18272229   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2316 >>2332

>>18272213

> They gonna suicide

Yep, and anons need to help people come to terms without killing themselves. It's one of the "goals" of this place and the plan. To prepare for "suicide night", which is presumably some event that will cause people to confront their cognitive dissonance. If they're prepared for it properly, with memes, then maybe they won't kill themselves when the news comes crashing down.

I hope.

Anonymous ID: 5d91c4 Feb. 2, 2023, 2:09 p.m. No.18272248   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18272234

> More than half are women, the other half are "women"

He's letting the cat out of the bag, likely because it's front-and-center on his mind to know and understand the distinction before he goes-a-sniffin'.

Anonymous ID: 5d91c4 Feb. 2, 2023, 3:14 p.m. No.18272622   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2659

>>18272337

Weather balloons pop at, what? 50,00 feet? I know it depends on how much gas you put in them, because they'll expand less as the pressure drops. Temperature also makes a big difference, swelling the balloon during the day.

A volume of helium gas the size of a cargo-trailer (car carrier) could carry about 40lbs, if I recall.

You'd need a gigantic balloon to lift a nuke, and it would "glow" on any radar screen. It would also be slow as shit if you tried to put engines on it, and blowing all-over-everywhere with the wind. Not much of a weapon, IMHO.

 

>>18272564

> What's the big deal? It's only going to kill you once!

My fuckin' sides!

Anonymous ID: 5d91c4 Feb. 2, 2023, 3:25 p.m. No.18272697   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2880

>>18272659

> Big-assed nasa balloons

Those carry less than 5lbs, per FAA regulations.

Did some head-scratching and realized my math is all fuckered-up. You'd need ten of those balloons to carry a 50lb weight.

Go look it up yourself if your don't believe me, but a balloon-deployed nuke is a terribly idea.

Anonymous ID: 5d91c4 Feb. 2, 2023, 3:39 p.m. No.18272810   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18272760

> Fleas deployed by balloons

A few lbs, at most. Anything the Chicoms sent over the US would have to be lightweight. So a nuke is probably out. Any kind of biological agent would have dispersion issues. I'm having a hard time thinking of a weapon that can be effectively deployed via balloon.

But I can think of plenty that could be directed by a balloon.

 

Reflective mylar balloons were used under the Eisenhower administration (I think, could have been Kennedy) to relay radio signals across the planet. They were put into low-earth orbit, and HAMs could bounce signals off of them. It was the response to Sputnik.

There is a good chance that the Chicom balloon is a communications and surveillance platform, and there is probably moar that one.

I looked into using balloon as part of a LoRaWan mesh, but it would have been too-expensive for me to keep operational. But the Chicom military? It would be a cheap way to get a signals platform into the US.