The EU law making process is quite complicated:
https://europa.eu/european-union/eu-law/decision-making/procedures_en
This one is in "second reading" as far as I could find quickly, so if the parliament approves it as-is, most hurdles have been passed, although there is still a second reading by the "Council", so national parliaments can also use the emergency break, although that is unlikely.
It seems opposition is growing, though:
https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/20/17482554/eu-european-union-copyright-filter-article-11-13-passes-juri-vote
> Joe McNamee, executive director of digital rights association EDRi, told The Verge that although the outcome of the JURI decision this morning was extremely disappointing, there are signs that the growing backlash against the legislation is having a palatable effect.
> “I was told that the volume of calls, emails, and texts everyone in the parliament has been getting has led people not in the [JURI] committee to start getting worried,” says McNamee. “This momentum is pushing down the likely majority [in the European Parliament] every day.”
> However, it’s not just a plenary vote by the European Parliament that will decide the fate of the Copyright Directive. Currently, the legislation is also set to be debated in what are known as “trilogue negotiations” — closed-door discussions between EU legislators and member states. These are intended to speed the process of adopting new laws, but critics say they are opaque and un-democratic. Whether or not the Copyright Directive will be subject to such negotiations is undecided (the JURI committee voted this morning that it should be, but MEPs have a chance to object next month). If the trilogues do go ahead it increases the chances that Articles 11 and 13 will become law. “[The legislation] is much less amenable to being rejected after this process,” says McNamee.
> If the legislation is passed in its current form it would have a devastating effect. Article 13, for example, would require the creation of an automatic filter for all online content uploaded in the EU, checking it against a database of copyright licenses. The system would be costly to create, impossible to keep up-to-date, and easily gamed by copyright trolls. And, as experts including Tim Berners-Lee and Jimmy Wales have warned, it would turn the internet into a “tool for the automated surveillance and control of its users.”
Seems like a repeat of the battle against software patents might be going on:
https://crashrecovery.org/council-transcript/NoLobbyistsAsSuch.pdf