Anonymous ID: 6e1e89 Feb. 3, 2023, 9:14 a.m. No.18276994   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Reporter: When it entered US airspace, has it changed it's course in any way?

Pentagon: The balloon has changed it's course, which is why we are monitoring it.

Anonymous ID: 6e1e89 Feb. 3, 2023, 9:17 a.m. No.18277017   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7024 >>7129 >>7149

Pentagon: Considering the size of the payload…looking at the potential for debris and the impact on civilians on the ground, or property damage…right now we are going to continue to monitor [not shoot down] and review options.

Anonymous ID: 6e1e89 Feb. 3, 2023, 9:21 a.m. No.18277041   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7075

Reporter asked about similar, previous incidents.

Pentagon: That information is classified…I can [only] confirm that there have been other incidents where balloons did come close to, or cross over US territory.

Anonymous ID: 6e1e89 Feb. 3, 2023, 9:23 a.m. No.18277057   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7074

Reporter: In the past, has [a balloon] flown over other sensitive areas such as military bases?

Pentagon: That information is classified.

Anonymous ID: 6e1e89 Feb. 3, 2023, 9:32 a.m. No.18277125   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7130

>>18277107

>if this were reversed and America had a balloon in China..I think before they could confirm either way it would have been shot down

True, but China also has no concern over what would happen to people or property on the ground.