Anonymous ID: 9579f9 Feb. 3, 2023, 9:22 a.m. No.18277049   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18276933

Since the military has to take orders from Potato, and Potato is owned by China, they now have to make excuses to reporters of why they can't blow it out of the sky.

They have tech to essentially vaporize the balloon and pose zero risk of 'debris' falling into civilian areas.

Anonymous ID: 9579f9 Feb. 3, 2023, 10:09 a.m. No.18277380   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18277178

 

That's a testament to the security and secrecy of the investigation.

 

Otherwise 'normies' will be instead having all sorts of fake information about it, and his name would be more 'mainstream' but not in a good way.

 

Better to be silent and have truth narrative, than be loud with false narrative.

Anonymous ID: 9579f9 Feb. 3, 2023, 10:39 a.m. No.18277554   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18277515

That meme perfectly encapsulates the mind virus psychological projection that psychopaths like Soros cause in the world.

 

They cause social crises all over the world, then claim to be the moral and intellectual authorities on how to to solve international crises.

 

These people are pure evil.

Anonymous ID: 9579f9 Feb. 3, 2023, 10:50 a.m. No.18277614   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7632

>>18277592

A non censored post is a post that was not deleted.

 

What was falsely claiming is being 'suppressed' can easily be refuted by the fact it wasn't deleted. It's still there for everyone to see.

 

If a post is not 'notabled', that doesn't mean it was 'suppressed'. Notables are additions.

Anonymous ID: 9579f9 Feb. 3, 2023, 10:57 a.m. No.18277648   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Kek, going by the shit logic of the red text screeching shill smearing and slandering baker for 'suppressing' a post by not notabling it, it follows that the red text shill must believe all 751 posts on every bread has to be notabled, lest all the non-notabled posts would thereby become 'suppressed'.

 

But that would render all notables as pointless duplication.

 

The fact the 'anon' is losing their shit and smearing baker, is all the proof that the motivation of that 'anon' is problematic.