>>18279727

Sure it is, example:

I was the one who stated that Twitter was:

1. Mainly bots

Reasoning: I would get nasty responses on Twitter when I asked a complicated question or made typos, the AI had problems. I therefor concluded they were using the same tech that was from functional programming emacs called the doctor. This has already been validated.

1. Using Private/Public Accounts or Networks

Reasoning: During the riots antifa/blm would go from city to city in an organized fashion. It's kind of hard to coordinate when one thug is running with a tv in one direction and the other in the other direction. I knew there are only a handful of sites capable of doing this. LinkedIn and Twitter.