Anonymous ID: 6ed72e June 20, 2018, 8:34 a.m. No.1829598   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1829581

Well then, those children aren't theirs, are they?

Your implication is that a child would be traveling with a man.

That child would not test to be related to the man.

Fucking get over it. You lose.

Anonymous ID: 6ed72e June 20, 2018, 8:39 a.m. No.1829661   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9693

>>1829613

Good point. If a man crosses the border with a child claiming to be a parent but found to not be related, he gets locked up longer.

 

If a man and woman are traveling with a child, but the child is not related to the man, only the woman, then child can be sheltered with the genetic parent.

 

If child isn't genetically related to either, child can be protected, adults jailed.

 

Whad'ya bet with one swift stroke of a pen, POTUS ends children coming over the border?