Anonymous ID: 172511 Feb. 6, 2023, 6:22 p.m. No.18298428   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8434 >>8437 >>8443 >>8444 >>8459 >>8489 >>8511 >>8525 >>8538 >>8548 >>8581 >>8745 >>8917 >>8923

My anti-Semitism is not merely "laced" through my opinion. It's overt and intentional. That's because I'm a vocal anti-Semite.

 

I'm not coming to negative conclusions about jews because I'm an anti-Semite. Rather I became an anti-Semite due to my negative conclusions about jews. Mat 13:10 - And the disciples came, and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in parables?

Mat 13:11 - He answered and said unto them, Because it is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it is not given.

Mat 13:12 - For whosoever hath, to him shall be given, and he shall have more abundance: but whosoever hath not, from him shall be taken away even that he hath.

Mat 13:13 - Therefore speak I to them in parables: because they seeing see not; and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand.

 

It isn't a popular or convenient opinion to have so it's typical for things to advance in that order.

 

Contrary to the commonly held (read: jewish perpetuated) belief about people such as myself I also don't have any major personal problems or such severe shortcomings that would compel me to "scapegoat" an entire group of people in order to exempt myself from responsibility.

 

My criticism is genuine, well pondered, and I think very fair.

 

I'm not interested in ideas about how I should be less anti-Semitic because I've already heard all of those arguments before thousands of times. How is it even possible not to have heard them?

 

Frankly I find it truly obtuse that anyone would approach an anti-Semite repeating those same arguments believing them to constitute a fresh perspective.

 

I find it appalling that people don't even consider why anti-Semites think the way we do.

 

There's all manner of deflection, theorizing, and excuse making, but at no point does the most obvious consideration enter into your thinking; that anti-Semitism is a measured response to what jews themselves are actually doing.

 

It's like the one thing that is permanently off the table is even a momentary consideration of jewish fault. It's logically absurd.

 

What makes it even more ridiculous is that arguments against anti-Semitism are invariably oriented around the notion that anti-Semites are as a matter of course in the wrong due to "hatred".

 

And yet, our entire argument is that the bad behavior of jews is informed by their obvious hatred of us.

 

It's the exact same accusation.

 

Jews have spent literal centuries cultivating an idea of this "sin" known as "prejudice", and rhetorically reinforcing the idea that we do it to them.

 

Yet the notion that the jews themselves could be at fault for this precise infraction is somehow considered totally outlandish and unacceptable.

 

With all the evidence at your disposal, and with all the people speaking out about it online, there's no excuse to not consider something other than the mainstream jewish perspective.

 

It should be clear to any honest and serious thinker that the sole reason for this imbalanced application of social taboo standards is the decades of near pornographic "holocaust" propaganda, giving rise to a severe prohibition on any and all criticism of jews no matter the circumstance.

 

The prevailing bias is not against jews, but in favor of them, and therefore by extension against their detractors.

 

Morally speaking - and when looked at through an objective lens - jews and those reflexively defending them do not have a leg to stand on.

 

At this point not being an anti-Semite is bordering on insane.