sorry if my thoughts offended.
i'm on board with this possibility.
Q's hint that she's really there solidifies the idea - she's fairly public with her schedule…wonder if we can place her through other communications at/around that time.
thoughts on this thought process anon?
legit argument, or too many fallacies?
Webb is WAAAAY too scattery to be Q.
could his lawsuit be a part of a bigger picture, civilian discovery and FOIA attempts?
I believe that - yes, absolutely. he digs relentlessly in the name of truth, regardless of his (actual) goal.
gotcha, sorry.
saw the juxtaposition of the original q clearance post with his lawsuit, thought it was an attempt at direct tie.
sorry! peace and love anon.
looks off camera
realizes time is running short
"that's why you had the leaking!"
phew. got that bit in.
wait, what did i just admit to?
based on what i've observed from webb:
he's feverishly investigating everything that pops up
he knows how to spot fake news and doesn't retract conjecture, just moves forward (very confusing)
sometimes he misses things
sometimes he finds things i don't, with real connections.
in the end, i think he's plausible-deniability-agent-anon.
but - "be careful who you follow" always haunts me.