Q says a change of narrative in public is necessary re: children in cages.
Seeing a lot of posts around social media like "if you support enforcing this law at our border, we don't have a political disagreement. We have a difference in morality and I will not forgive you."
Scott Adams suggested we frame this more honestly with the fact this is between child trafficking or children being separated from POTENTIAL parents.
Can those here with influential/prominent social media accounts start attempting to frame the conversation this way? The "Obama enforced this law, Bush passed it" angle isn't working. Can we hi-jack their appeal to emotions and call a spade a spade? I.E, "if you support endangering children to being trafficked across the border, we don't have a political disagreement, we have a moral disagreement." etc?
Normies need help seeing where the moral high ground is.