Anonymous ID: 20b305 Feb. 9, 2023, 6:35 a.m. No.18313229   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3348

>>18313217

> "We the People" Shilling

 

โ€œThe Constitution says: "We, the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." The meaning of this is simply We, the people of the United States, acting freely and voluntarily as individuals, consent and agree that we will cooperate with each other in sustaining such a government as is provided for in this Constitution. The necessity for the consent of "the people" is implied in this declaration. The whole authority of the Constitution rests upon it. If they did not consent, it was of no validity. Of course it had no validity, except as between those who actually consented. No one's consent could be presumed against him, without his actual consent being given, any more than in the case of any other contract to pay money, or render service. And to make it binding upon any one, his signature, or other positive evidence of consent, was as necessary as in the case of any other-contract. If the instrument meant to say that any of "the people of the United States" would be bound by it, who did not consent, it was a usurpation and a lie. The most that can be inferred from the form, "We, the people," is, that the instrument offered membership to all "the people of the United States;" leaving it for them to accept or refuse it, at their pleasure.โ€

โ€• Lysander Spooner, No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority

Anonymous ID: 20b305 Feb. 9, 2023, 8:08 a.m. No.18313645   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18313613

> because it can carry an (a near) infinitely greater amount of data itself.

There is a limit on the usefulness of greater signal fidelity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist_frequency

Eventually "moar fidelity" is just wasted shelf space.

Anonymous ID: 20b305 Feb. 9, 2023, 8:28 a.m. No.18313735   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>18313703

> Artificial "Intelligence"

That's just the colloquial term. The technical term for these is "expert-system."

They're built as gigantic, linked-and-nested "if-then" statements, using weighted modulus operators to navigate the trees and lists.

They're still computers, they're just programmed differently than what you're used to.