Wow.

Great article.

I am no economist.

But for the first time, I feel like I understand President Trumps MAGA-nomics, and why it worked.

It worked so fast too.

In my 63 years, I never saw such a full scale shift in the US Economy, compared to President Trumps time in office. I have seen bubbles, and disruptions. Never a full shift across the board in every sector in a positive direction. I think something similar was happening when I was born, just after the war, but, mebbe too young to remember?

It is also clear that if (((they))) require the removal of the Constitution to establish (((their))) global government, (((they))) must destroy the US economy.

They need to buy the country, so the people have no land in America.

They need to steal the energy and nations resources.

They need to destroy the movement and energy of the people.

They are destroying the election process.

They are destroying the education system and taking control from the parents of the children being educated.

They need to make "Service" (slaves) instead of innovators out of the nation using a "service economy" that manufactures nothing with it's own national assets.

They need to spy to find their enemies early enough to destroy the enemies of their fascism, while they merge the power of government with the monopoly of corporations.

They need to destroy the right to free speech, and remove the right of self defense.

Wow.

No wonder the globalists Who would rule the world, and enslave every human hate President Trump.

He knows what he is doing. As it is described in the article, what he did makes so much sense to this anon now, and explains what we all witnessed during his Presidency.

Here’s Why the Big Club and People Managing Ron DeSantis Hate Donald Trump

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/01/26/heres-why-the-big-club-and-people-managing-ron-desantis-hate-donald-trump/

>>18318731

Yes, it was notable, and thank you.

Quite the education to read, if you have no background in economics.

Thank you for making this notable.

I would not have found it otherwise.

There may be other parts to the article? I am going to go read more and find out.

Very much appreciated the notable anon.

>>18318735

>>>18318710

>>Do you think the information on government agencies targeting and killing its own citizens should be kept from the people?

>Some people can't handle that at this point.

Then they are dead anyway, for lack of knowledge, right?

>The choice to know is ours, isn't it?

Unfortunate fact.

>However, what is not optional is the recognition of all "inalienable" rights.

So True.

>If people's God-given liberties were respected and they were given true informed consent, how many would take COVID "jabs", whether or not they knew they were actually bioweapons?

>>18318710

>Should Q keep that hidden in the 60% to protect those agencies so that they can be restructured?

The agencies just colluded with corporations to commit genocide of the population. This is everything that needs to be known about that 60% to expunge all agencies, and their revolving door authoritarian actors, before they try killing the population again.

>>18318749

> Part of the issue is at least in congress is that the amount of funds for bull shit elections and then the greed and criminality it attracts a certain type of person.

Most of those funds come from corporations. Funds, if any, should be from individuals only, same max, like a vote.

Of course if we took back the airwaves, we the people could provide publicity for candidates and their ideas with equal time, and NO DONATIONS whatsoever.

We do after all, own the internet since we built it. We always have owned the radio and TV airwaves. The FFC is coordination only. (We own the FCC too, by the way)

> This also goes for the positions you stated and how it has been shifted to serve the elite rather than the people

There is also the issue REVOLVING Doors with corporations, issues of threats against legislators, bribes, creation of blackmail evidence, even murder of our public servants. Look at all of our public servants who have been murdered for looking into child trafficking these past years.

Was thinking with modern technology, we have what we need to require all public servants to wear the same cameras the police do while on duty, or anywhere in public.

It would attract the kind of public servant that would not care, since there is no intent to do anything they would not do in public.

It would give us a chance to keep an eye on them in the event they are approached and threatened, approached for a bribe, or, for a back room deal and an offer they can not refuse.

It might also be a witness to murder, by car crash, etc, so.

Force live stream the government servants.

For their own good, and for ours?

Voluntary lack of privacy while in service?

Back off the evil types who want to stay off camera and out of the light?