https://www.lifenews.com/2023/02/09/lisa-murkowski-and-susan-collins-introduce-bill-to-legalize-abortions-up-to-birth-nationwide/

The whole article is worth reading, imo. It gives a lot of details that would probably make a difference in people's thinking on the subject.

My conjecture at this point is that women probably (even though I disagree with this and think it is morally wrong) got rid of "problem" pregnancies in the past via various means done privately and that the health risks to the process were equal or less than letting a pregnancy progress to full term and then having the baby killed immediately prior to when natural birth would have occurred anyway. I think that a good part of the US economy is actually based on turning people into a commodity in various ways. So bringing abortion out of the "closet" so to speak actually reflects "their" attempt at profiting while perfecting various eugenist techniques.

>>18318710

>Do you think the information on government agencies targeting and killing its own citizens should be kept from the people?

Some people can't handle that at this point. The choice to know is ours, isn't it? However, what is not optional is the recognition of all "inalienable" rights. If people's God-given liberties were respected and they were given true informed consent, how many would take COVID "jabs", whether or not they knew they were actually bioweapons?

The discussion is quite obtuse (intentionally so to keep us in the dark?) but it appears the CDC wants to provide liability protection for vaccine harms to "COVID" vaccine makers. Who protects the people from a bioweapon called a "vaccine"?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/official-cdc-adds-covid-19-vaccine-routine-immunization-schedule-children-adolescents/