Anonymous ID: 896f28 June 20, 2018, 11:52 a.m. No.1832517   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2539 >>2543 >>2546 >>2569 >>2572 >>2579 >>2587 >>2611 >>2618 >>2624 >>2687 >>2716 >>2727 >>2762

Q:

I’ve been following you from the beginning and was red-pilled for about two years before that, but I have to admit I’m growing weary. We are constantly asked to “trust the plan” and look to the “proofs.” To someone who wants to believe, the proofs are gold. But we’re not the ones who need to be convinced. You want the proofs to convince the sheep, but that’s never going to happen with the way things stand now.

  1. The clock is too confusing.

  2. The 111-day theory has too many holes.

  3. The tweets and deltas have too many other explanations (e.g., Trump pre-schedules his tweets, so someone at Twitter sees them, then makes a Q-post a certain amount of time before that).

  4. The photos also have other explanations (e.g., We know any and all apps on our phones can access the entire phone. Those photos could be collected by someone at any app program).

And when someone asks for something specific (i.e., POTUS eating popcorn), we’re given a Nunes tweet with a popcorn emoji. Again, a believer will say “There are no coincidences!” while a sheep will say, “Uh, yeah, there are. That’s not even close to the original request.”

You want to convince the sheep in no uncertain terms? How about something like this:

  1. Tell us the specific date a specific event will take place. I know you don’t commit to dates because things change, but if this is as planned out as we’re led to believe, there have to be some solid dates/events.

  2. Give us a picture of POTUS with popcorn.

  3. Describe the tie POTUS will wear during his next press briefing.

  4. Describe the dress FLOTUS will wear during her next public appearance.

  5. Give us a sentence or two from POTUS’ next press briefing.

Any of these could not be considered a coincidence. And none of them should threaten the plan. If you want to PROVE you’re real, do it in no uncertain terms for the sheep. Sheep aren’t going to have the patience/interest in looking at deltas and tweets and the ridiculous flowcharts you have to go through with the current “proofs.”

I hope you have psychologists on board who are advising because as an ardent Q-follower from the beginning, I’m losing steam. I’m tired of trying to red-pill my husband only to have him find holes in everything. I’m tired of the constant MSM-talking points barraging me from my friends on Facebook. I’m tired of finding “proof” in things by trusting the plan and massaging the facts to fit. I consider myself emotionally strong, but I’m reaching my breaking point. Unless something concrete comes out soon to show the cabal is going down, I’m worried we’re turning into a Q cult where we believe and trust everything that comes from you, even when the evidence does not support it.

Anonymous ID: 896f28 June 20, 2018, noon No.1832646   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1832618

No. Q said we need to keep up with the proofs for the sheep who will start coming here. I'm saying the sheep I've shown them to don't believe, so this plan seems flawed. It has nothing to do with me.

Anonymous ID: 896f28 June 20, 2018, 12:15 p.m. No.1832839   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2943

>>1832762

>(You)

Let me spell it out for you:

 

1) You assume a sheep is going to care enough to go back and find the posts listed for each day

 

2) You assume the sheep is as motivated as you to make inferences based on what the Q posts said, which generally requires massaging of facts

 

3) You assume the sheep are going to spend significant time perusing twitter, the chans, or the news to find said weak connections

 

I don't see that happening.