>>1831801 (last bread)
Sessions is self-contradictory in this op-ed. First he says that 75,000 illegal immigrants with children cross. Then, in the next paragraph he says the separations are rare because most children cross unaccompanied. 75,000 is arguable not "rare."
Racist
Under-educated
Southern
Mysogynistic
Islamophobic
Populist
Fascist
Homophobic
Old white male (not sure how that became an insult, but it seems to be)
Women controlled by their husbands
Patriarchal
Climate denier
Science denier
I've been thinking about yesterday's Q proof of the 1 minute delta and the Q posted photos of eyes.
Sorry, but I don't think that's a convincing proof that would sway a skeptical critical thinker.
For the first photo, we spent over and hour making multiple speculations on who was in the photo. Only when Q said it was 45 did that discussion slow (but not end). The second photo persuasivly looks like POTUS's eyes, but we really don't have any proof of exactly when the photo was taken. There have to be hundreds of thousands of unpublished videos and photos of POTUS in front of a flag. Any of those could have been edited into the image Q posted.
Yes, the one minute delta is intriguing, but it's also not impossible. Trump's been on a tweetstorm lately, and Q was posting a lot yesterday too.
It's not beyond random chance that Q could get lucky and post a minute before POTUS.
By the way, I'm convinced that Q is close to POTUS, or is POTUS, but I'm not sure that weak "proofs" really help our cause.
For me, it's the sheer number of coincidences that is persuasive.
Going back to the beginning, Q posting about North Korea, then POTUS tweeting the video with a photo of North Korea was persuasive. With time it becomes even more so. Kim stopped shooting missiles at that time. Then we had the summit. While that's not exactly a proof, it's persuasive.