Anonymous ID: 22182d Feb. 10, 2023, 10:10 p.m. No.18323912   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3936 >>3943 >>3944 >>3946 >>3948 >>3955 >>3974 >>4038

>>18323240

Barry Hinckley, along with Matthew Tyrmand, are the ringleaders in an ongoing coup attempt against James O'Keefe at Project Veritas.

 

Support Independent Media via Monthly Membership, as little as 3 cents a day: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/addyadds

 

Follow Amuse:

 

Amuse Twitter: https://twitter.com/amuse

Amuse Substack: https://politiquerepublic.substack.com/p/the-effort-to-silence-james-okeefe

Anonymous ID: 22182d Feb. 10, 2023, 10:16 p.m. No.18323936   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3944 >>3947 >>3955 >>3974 >>4038

>>18323912

The Effort to Silence James O'Keefe

The Board of Directors of Project Veritas is set to commit corporate seppuku by firing the organization's Founder and CEO tomorrow. Is it too late to save Project Veritas?

 

UPDATE No. 2: Mike Swartz Tweeted a cease and desist letter from a law firm representing Project Veritas donors objecting to the removal of James O’Keefe. The donors argue that the removal of O’Keefe would violate Virginia law—a novel argument to say the least.

 

UPDATE No. 1: Since writing this story I have heard from more than one former Project Veritas employee that they were angry that James O’Keefe got all of the credit and praise for their hard work. They claim that James never had any ideas and they had to do all of the work while O’Keefe was lounging on his sailboat. According to the disgruntled former employees, James would come in at the last minute to yell at everyone and leave immediately after filming his segments. I find this hard to believe but if you have any additional insight or information please DM me on Twitter: @amuse.

 

There is an effort underway at Project Veritas to oust the company’s founder and frontman James O'Keefe. Reportedly the board of directors voted to put O’Keefe on paid administrative leave ahead of the February 10th board meeting where they plan to fire him for cause—if they do Project Veritas will be dead.

 

There is little doubt that the brash young executive may be in over his head running a $25M nonprofit news organization but the answer isn’t to oust him—the answer is to surround him with executives and directors who can help him pursue the company’s mission. Any director, executive, or employee who is unwilling to support O’Keefe should simply resign—killing the company is NOT the answer.

 

Over the past decade, O’Keefe has grown the nonprofit’s revenue by more than 200% and exposed malfeasance by organizations ranging from Acorn to Planned Parenthood to Pfizer—an impressive feat for a Philosophy major from Rutgers.

 

YEAR REVENUE

2020 $22,034,786

2019 $12,151,496

2018 $ 8,860,335

2017 $ 8,029,634

2016 $ 4,857,637

2015 $ 3,705,349

2014 $ 2,416,542

2013 $ 1,201,646

2012 $ 738,210

Anonymous ID: 22182d Feb. 10, 2023, 10:18 p.m. No.18323943   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3955 >>3973 >>3974 >>4038

>>18323912

Despite his impressive track record, forces within the company decided they would be better off without O’Keefe at the helm. Instead of helping O’Keefe develop his management and corporate governance skills a small group of executives and directors rallied support among disgruntled employees in an effort to remove him.

 

Share

Barry Hinkley (he/him), Project Veritas' Chief Strategy Officer

 

Reportedly, the effort to oust O’Keefe began in earnest four months ago when Barry Hinkley (he/him) was hired as Chief Strategy Officer.1

Heir to the Hinckley Yacht family Barry ran a failed Senate candidate from Rhode Island and was CEO of a failed tech startup that called itself the Airbnb of private house parties. Things came to a head when O’Keefe reportedly fired Hinkley. In response, Hinckley wrote an email to all 65 Project Veritas employees claiming that he had “stood up to a bully” and lost his job as a result. Next, he convinced eleven sixteen other employees to sign a letter declaring among other things that O’Keefe was a “power-drunk tyrant” which was sent to the company’s board of directors in an effort to oust him (importantly most people who signed the letter had never witnessed the behavior outlines in the letter).2

 

According to various employees, Barry Hinckley (CSO)3

, Matthew Tyrmand (BoD)4

, Tom O’Hara (CFO), and Daniel Strack (Executive Director)5

were the so-called ringleaders of the effort to remove O’Keefe from the company. Allegedly they have claimed O’Keefe misappropriated company funds, incurred outlandish expenses, and violated the company’s various HR policies. The ringleaders organized an ‘intervention’ where the board spent hours confronting O’Keefe bringing in multiple employees to share their grievances with the board. The overarching argument made to the board was that Project Veritas will soon collapse entirely as donors and employees flee if O'Keefe is not removed—of course if James IS removed donors and employees will ALSO flee. By the end of the meeting, the board voted to put O’Keefe on paid administrative leave pending a board meeting on February 10th (tomorrow).6

 

Public filings only show that Project Veritas only has three directors: John K Garvey, Colin Sharkey, and Matthew Tyrmand7

but presumably O’Keefe and others are ALSO on the board of directors. In fact, according to Mike Swartz's source, the current board consists of Matt Tyrmand, John Garvey, George Skakel, Joseph Barton, Steve Alembik, Tom O’Hara, and Barry Hinckley.

Twitter avatar for @OldRowSwig

Swig 🇺🇸 @OldRowSwig

Board members and C Suite officers involved in this according to my source are as follows:

 

Board members:

Matt Tyrmand - Ringleader

John Garvey

George Skakel

Joseph Barton (not the congressman)

Steve Alembik

 

CFO: Tom O’Hara

COO: Barry Hinckley (Ringleader pronouns in bio)

Image

3:44 AM ∙ Feb 9, 2023

3,882Likes1,166Retweets

Anonymous ID: 22182d Feb. 10, 2023, 10:19 p.m. No.18323946   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3955 >>3957 >>3974 >>4038

>>18323912

Unlike most companies and nonprofits, James O’Keefe is Project Veritas—without him, it is almost certain that the company will no longer exist. Nonprofit board members owe their organizations duties of care, loyalty, and obedience—they are legally obligated to put the organization’s interest above their own personal or professional interests—removing O’Keefe would constitute a breach of their fiduciary duties. If anyone on the board does not think they can work with O’Keefe they should simply resign. If any employee does not want to work with O’Keefe they too should resign. If there are concerns about misappropriation or other infractions the board should simply work with O’Keefe to cure the issues and put in controls to prevent similar occurrences in the future. Firing O’Keefe would be tantamount to cutting off your nose to spite your face.

 

Unfortunately, Project Veritas’ Executive Director, Daniel Strack, who joined the company last year believes that the company can easily continue without O’Keefe as he explained:

 

There are 65+ employees at Project Veritas dedicated to continuing the mission to expose corruption, dishonesty, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions. To our supporters: We hear you, we care about you, and we will never give up. ~Daniel Strack, Executive Director Project Veritas

 

Strack touts8

the fact that seven years ago he was a Managing Director at Goldman Sachs in his LinkedIn headline—a role he was ousted from in less than three years—an ouster so shocking it earned an article in a banking trade magazine.9

Strack is likely convinced that no one is irreplaceable—he is very wrong. Ironically, Strack is the day-to-day manager of the company allowing O'Keefe to focus on being the organization's public face and onscreen talent.10

It is the day-to-day issues that the company is struggling with and not O'Keefe's public persona. It is literally Strack's job to handle 'distractions' including lawsuits and employee morale—jobs he seems to have failed to handle. If the board of directors is worried about the health of the company it ought to work with Strack to better support O'Keefe and the needs of the organization or they should replace him. Additionally, the board ought to consider paying O'Keefe more. According to legal filings, James is paid less than $400,000 a year despite bringing in more than $20,000,000 in revenue—a typical salesman bringing in that sort of revenue would be making north of a million dollars a year. I suspect that would resolve whatever issues they have with his expenses.

 

So what EXACTLY is O’Keefe ‘charged’ with? According to the Daily Beast11

, his crimes include:

 

Improperly used PV funds to cover travel expenses for employees to watch him perform the lead role in a production of the musical Oklahoma!

 

Improperly used PV funds to produce a video of himself dancing while wearing a bulletproof vest

 

Calling Spencer Meads a pussy after the FBI raided his home

 

Required a staffer to take a polygraph as part of a leak investigation

 

Stealing an 8-month pregnant woman’s sandwich

 

Creating a hostile workplace that was raucous, sexually charged, and featured one drug overdose

 

Instead of working to find a replacement for Strack, the board rehired the two individuals working overtime to oust James O’Keefe—Barry Hinckley (CSO) and Tom O’Hara (CFO) and announced they would be implementing a “final solution” this Friday. According to New York Magazine, there is a core group of employees including R.C. Maxwell that remain loyal to O’Keefe.12

I predict that if Matthew Tyrmand and the rest of the board remove James it will be the beginning of the end of Project Veritas—but I have no doubt O'Keefe will land on his feet reaching new heights in his career and mission.

Anonymous ID: 22182d Feb. 10, 2023, 10:19 p.m. No.18323948   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3955 >>3974 >>4038

>>18323912

Politique Republic is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

 

1

 

https://www.linkedin.com/in/barry-hinckley-068128/

 

2

 

https://www.scribd.com/document/624864598/Memo-to-PV-Board-Feb-6-2023-1

 

3

 

https://www.linkedin.com/in/barry-hinckley-068128/

 

4

 

https://twitter.com/MatthewTyrmand

 

5

 

https://www.efinancialcareers.com/news/2016/11/tenure-goldman-sachs-mds

 

6

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20230209044124/https://www.thedailybeast.com/james-okeefe-outright-cruel-to-project-veritas-employees-internal-memo?source=twitter&via=desktop

 

7

 

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/272894856/202003179349305580/full

 

8

 

https://www.linkedin.com/in/daniel-strack/

 

9

 

https://www.efinancialcareers.com/news/2016/11/tenure-goldman-sachs-mds

 

10

 

https://thedcpatriot.com/insane-project-veritas-board-of-directors-removes-james-okeefe-and-puts-him-on-paid-administrative-leave/

 

11

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20230209044124/https://www.thedailybeast.com/james-okeefe-outright-cruel-to-project-veritas-employees-internal-memo?source=twitter&via=desktop

 

12

 

https://web.archive.org/web/20230208233612/https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/02/james-okeefe-project-veritas-paid-leave.html

 

https://politiquerepublic.substack.com/p/the-effort-to-silence-james-okeefe

Anonymous ID: 22182d Feb. 10, 2023, 10:27 p.m. No.18323969   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3994

Donald J. Trump

1h

Will Trump Hating Prosecutor Jack Smith be investigating the FACT that they SPIED on my campaign, even as I was in the Oval Office, they Stuffed the Ballot Boxes (per 2000 Mules), used Covid to cheat, that the FBI pushed Twitter & Facebook around, causing massive voter disruption, and so much more? That’s really what he should be looking at, not asking a very decent Mike Pence why he didn’t send the votes back to State Legislatures for scrutinization, which he could have done. Get the RIGGERS!

 

Feb 10, 2023, 11:55 PM

 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/109844321125474837

Anonymous ID: 22182d Feb. 10, 2023, 10:33 p.m. No.18323990   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18323964

Sometimes it starts a conversation, 80% of the time I upset them

 

No fucks given, someone has to provoke them to question themselves.

 

That is incarceration of elders….

Anonymous ID: 22182d Feb. 10, 2023, 10:41 p.m. No.18324020   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18324015

watchng this, goood

 

Project Veritas REMOVES James O'Keefe, Employee Letter EXPOSED, Sources Say THIS IS A COUP And LIES

 

Project Veritas REMOVES James O'Keefe, Employee Letter EXPOSED, Sources Say THIS IS A COUP And LIES. Several employees signed a letter demanding action against James O'Keefe despite admitting many never witnessed any abuse.

 

Right now the anti-establishment, culture war right is embroiled in massive in-fighting that will mean the end of the movement if people do not stop warring.

 

Shortly after project Veritas' biggest moment ever, exposing Pfizer, this happens leading many to speculate as to the true intentions of this ouster.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGb8DQmbGNI

Anonymous ID: 22182d Feb. 10, 2023, 10:45 p.m. No.18324034   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18323969

1155

Apr 15, 2018 9:06:25 PM EDT

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: b53533 No. 1057351

>>1057113

Focus should also be on Supreme Court promise.

Only dropped here.

POTUS validating drops via Twitter per plan/timing.

Future proves past.

Comms understood?

Q