>>1834282
"What are we leading up to?"
I'm thinking the Seth Rich MOAB!
You see, this https://twitter.com/YahooNews/status/1009540003674943488 leads to this https://www.yahoo.com/news/obama-cyber-chief-confirms-stand-order-russian-cyberattacks-summer-2016-204935758.html where I read the following:
"That conclusion was reinforced Wednesday by another witness, Victoria Nuland, who served as assistant secretary of state for Europe during the Obama administration. She told the panel that she had been briefed as early as December 2015 about the hacking of the Democratic National Committee — long before senior DNC officials were aware of it — and that the intrusion had all the hallmarks of a Russian operation."
So, her claims would have to be backed by evidence, right? Thus, her claims will be investigated, right? Which means that all 'efforts' to thwart the "Russian hackers" would also be investigated, right? Sooo, doesn't that involve reading a lot of emails, and thus finding the true Seth Rich story?
Just a thought.