>she looks dreadful
That is called no make up, special lighting, filters and no retouching.
She's fucking 64 FFS!
>she looks dreadful
That is called no make up, special lighting, filters and no retouching.
She's fucking 64 FFS!
>"the footage shows Obama and Michelle having sex with the victim
Were they double penetrating the poor kid?
Or maybe this?
>weโre seeing lots of newfound or renewed (and welcome) interest in our work on rail safety, so I wanted to share more about what weโve been doing in this area:
We're going to ban qualified white workers and only employ unqualified diverse employees from now on. Physically and mentally disabled, transgender African American, illiterate and non English speaking undocumented migrants will be actively encouraged to apply.
If one wishes to know if it is me or I, simply remove the other party from the sentence - me have had โฆ
Let's just include all unsauced claims then, shall we?
I'm sure we could make some pretty fucking great notables, right?
>Faggot squeals newfag
>>implying notables are endorsements
Au contraire. Implying that notables be notable, not RRN tier anal leakage.
Keks in les grenouilles