Anonymous ID: 1ae360 Feb. 16, 2023, 6:16 p.m. No.18361974   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1994

>>18361743

Ok, let's ignore the shitty memes and the muh joo content, but it made anon kek.

Has the object of the derision actually caught on?

The muh pig memes are fucking dire and the intention to create a following has failed miserably with only the creator and its ip hopping attempting to foster at least a modicum of credibily; it's transparencey obvious to anyone with more than two neurons firing simultabeously!

Anon must confess that anon kekked with the nom de plume, mr swine.

Anonymous ID: 1ae360 Feb. 16, 2023, 6:47 p.m. No.18362165   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2186 >>2198

>>18362118

It's the obvious attempt at trying to embed itself as some form of board mascot that raises anon's hackles.

Board identities are anathema to everything anon's stand for and counter to what Q has stated who, after all, is the raison d'รชtre of the very board itself.