https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/15/16145668/eclipse-nasa-balloons-stratosphere-bacteria-life-mars

Why NASA is sending bacteria into the sky on balloons during the eclipse

Aug 15, 2017

As the Moon blocks the Sun’s light completely next week in a total solar eclipse, more than 50 high-altitude balloons in over 20 locations across the US will soar up to 100,000 feet in the sky. On board will be Raspberry Pi cameras, weather sensors, and modems to stream live eclipse footage. They’ll also have metal tags coated with very hardy bacteria, because NASA wants to know whether they will survive on Mars.

Every time we send a rover to the Red Planet, our own microorganisms latch on to them and hitch a ride across space. What happens to these bacteria once they’re on Mars? Do they mutate? Do they die? Or can they continue living undisturbed, colonizing worlds other than our own? To answer these questions we need to run experiments here on Earth, and the eclipse on August 21st provides the perfect opportunity.

“I said, oh my god, that’s like being on Mars!”

The balloons are being sent up by teams of high school and college students from across the US as part of the Eclipse Ballooning Project, led by Angela Des Jardins of Montana State University. When Jim Green, the director of planetary science at NASA, first heard that over 50 balloons were being flown to the stratosphere to live stream the eclipse, he couldn’t believe his ears. “I said, oh my god, that’s like being on Mars!” Green tells The Verge. NASA couldn’t pass on the opportunity.

The upper part of the Earth’s stratosphere — just above the ozone layer — is very much like the surface of Mars: it’s about minus 35 degrees Fahrenheit, with very rarified air, and it’s hammered by the Sun’s ultraviolet radiation. During the eclipse, conditions will get even more Mars-like: the temperatures will go down even further, and the Moon will buffer some of those ultraviolet rays to better resemble the radiation on the Red Planet. “It’s really quite an outstanding astrobiology and planetary protection experiment,” Green says.

A photo taken from the stratosphere (84,000 feet up) during one of Montana Space Grant Consortium's high-altitude balloon tests in 2014.

Photo: Montana State University

The bacteria that will fly to the edge of space is a particular strain called Paenibacillus xerothermodurans. It was first isolated from soil outside a spacecraft-assembly facility at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida in 1973, says Parag Vaishampayan, an astrobiologist at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. These bacteria form shields of spores that allow them to survive even when conditions turn deadly. It takes around 140 hours at 257 degrees Fahrenheit to kill 90 percent of these bacteria, Vaishampayan tells The Verge.

“These are some of the most resilient types of bacteria that we know of,” says David J. Smith, a researcher in the Space Biosciences Division at NASA's Ames Research Center.

Last week, Smith finished mailing the bacteria — which are not dangerous for people or the environment — to the student groups. (Only 34 of the balloons will carry the bacteria.) The microorganisms are dried onto the surface of two metal cards the size of a dog tag. One card will fly to the stratosphere, while one will remain on the ground to function as a control group. On eclipse day, the balloons will launch every 15 minutes or so from states that are in the path of the Moon’s shadow, Des Jardins says. They’ll fly for about two hours, reaching the stratosphere and eventually popping because of the pressure drop. Once they’re back on the ground (a parachute will slow down descent), the students will track them by GPS, recover the metal tags, and mail them back to NASA.

p1

>>18363674

A small metal card used to transport bacteria.

Photo: NASA / Ames Research Center / Tristan Caro

That’s when Vaishampayan and Smith will get to analyze how many bacteria have died, and whether their DNA has changed in any way. If some of them survive the flight, that might mean that these bacteria may have already survived a trip to the Red Planet as hitchhikers on a Mars rover. We don’t know for sure whether Paenibacillus xerothermodurans is actually on any Mars rover. (It was found outside the spacecraft-assembly facility, not on the spacecraft themselves, Vaishampayan says.) But even if it’s not, learning more about these resilient bacteria could help us understand how similar ones could behave on Mars, and help NASA better understand the risk of infecting other worlds.

After all, we send million-dollar spacecraft to other planets and moons to search for alien life, so it makes sense that we’d want to make sure these places are protected from Earth’s germs. Pushing organisms to the known limits of life can also help NASA find that life. If we know that resilient bacteria can’t withstand certain conditions, then we won’t look for life when those same conditions are found on other planets, Smith says.

“I don’t think it’s ever been done.”

NASA has conducted very few experiments with high-altitude balloons, and none with this particular strain of bacteria. So flying over 30 balloons at once, under such perfect Mars-like conditions that won’t be possible to replicate in the lab, is an amazing opportunity. “I don’t think it’s ever been done in terms of a coordinated astrobiology experiment happening across the entire continental United States on the same day,” Smith says. “This is spatial coverage that one could never dream of in other circumstances.”

Green hopes the experiment will also inspire the next generation of astrobiologists and planetary protection officers. He got into science when he was in high school and had the chance to use an observatory telescope to observe the Sun. Taking part in the Eclipse Ballooning Project might do the same for the students flying the balloons. “You never know what turns kids on [to science],” Green says. “You never know how excited they can be.”

2 of 2

>>18363674

>>18363675

https://sputniknews.com/20170819/nasa-bacteria-balloon-solar-eclipse-

1056613527.html

NASA Launching Huge Bacteria-Filled Balloons During Solar Eclipse on Monday8.19.2017

And it's not because NASA is just super excited about the solar eclipse. This endeavor is part of the Eclipse Ballooning Project, which will help researchers prepare for a Mars trip.

Teams across the US are sending approximately 75 balloons equipped with cameras and trackers over 80,000 feet in the air. Over 30 of the balloons will also carry a highly resilient strain of bacteria called Paenibacillus xerothermodurans attached to aluminum "coupons." Scientists are hoping to discover how the bacteria will react in the surface atmosphere on Mars.

"We have to be extremely careful that we don't bring bacteria or other tiny Earth organisms to other planets," project leader and Director of the Montana Space Grant Consortium Angela Des Jardins, told Gizmodo.

"While most of these tiny forms of life that exist in abundance around us won't survive the trip through space, it's understood that some resilient types could ‘go dormant' on the trip and then survive on the surface of the other planet. Therefore, in order to be prepared to keep planets we visit absolutely pristine, it's important to understand how bacteria might behave there."

The balloons will also carry cameras to capture videos of cloud formations during the solar eclipse. Some of the balloons will also have weather stations called radiosondes attached to them so that researchers can identify how earth's atmosphere changes during an eclipse.

"We anticipate having high-quality video and images back from the balloons flights within a day or two," Jardins said.

"Analysis of the bacteria experiment will be done by scientists at Cornell and it will likely be a month or two before results are ready. Analysis of the atmospheric response to the eclipse (from our special set of weather balloons) will similarly take a month or two."

So, it seems like researchers are ready to gain lots of knowledge from the solar eclipse taking place in a couple days. Wondering how you can benefit from the balloon experiment? Well, NASA will be livestreaming the eclipse on the internet using its balloon cameras. Now, that's an interesting vantage point you can brag to your friends about.

>>18363687

>>18363674

>>18363675

https://scrippsnews.com/stories/nasa-to-send-bacteria-to-stratosphere-during-eclipse/

NASA Is Sending Bacteria Into The Sky During The Total Solar EclipseAug. 17, 2017

NASA and Montana State Universityare ready to send loads of bacteria into the stratosphere. But don't worry; it's all for science.

Teams across the U.S. will release about 100 balloons during the Aug. 21 total solar eclipse. They'll float around 85,000 feet in the air, and each balloon will have cameras for video and photos, as well as a tracker.

Some of those balloons will also carry samples of a highly resistant bacteria. NASA scientists want to see how it reacts to Mars-like conditions.

The upper part of Earth's stratosphere has conditions very similar to Mars' atmosphere at the surface. There, the air is thin, and the environment is cold and full of radiation. During the eclipse, Earth's atmospheric conditions will become even more like Mars.

The experiment aims to test the limits of living things on Earth.

You Could Be NASA's New Planetary Protection Officer

You Could Be NASA's New Planetary Protection Officer

If you got the job, you'd protect NASA's search for alien life — and make six figures.

LEARN MORE

Eventually, the balloons will pop, and devices will send the data and bacteria down to the ground. NASA will compare the stratosphere bacteria with samples left on Earth to see what changed.

Researchers say they hope to learn a lot from the balloon experiment. And here's a bonus: The onboard cameras will livestream the eclipse on the internet for millions to watch.

NASA is using balloons to send bacteria into the stratosphere. The test will see how something that lives on Earth responds to the conditions.

>>18363592

uh huh

https://mobile.twitter.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1626295482426220547

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 15

The First Sequencing of the Bivalent vaccines is now available for public consumption.

WARNING- There are contaminating Expression vectors in the vaccines that contain antibiotic resistance genes.

This might explain the prolonged expression of spike protein in many studies

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 15

This sequencing cost $7 per sample.

I wonder if these Pharma's can afford this for every lot?

Nah.. Why would they?

Your government gave them a liability shield and even paid them billions for the products they then mandated.

anandamide.substack.com

Curious Kittens

We shouldn't have to do our own Fragment analysis and Sequencing

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 15

Among other treats in these expression vectors are the SV40 mammalian promoter and a high copy origin of replication (pUC) for bacterial amplification of these plasmids.

The Biodistribution studies covered by

@Jikkyleaks

show LNPs getting into the intestines.

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 15

Its estimated that each shot contains billions of these plasmids and if they get into the gut microbiome, they can replicate to 50-300 copies per cell.

If any vaccinated patient is then placed on Neomycin or Kanamycin, these will be the only bacteria that survive

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 15

As these plasmid encode Kan and Neo resistance. Its not known if these contaminating plasmid can also express spike protein but some of the vectors have T7 tails so we cant rule that out.

What happens if we inject billions of Antibiotic resistance genes into billions of people?

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 15

What happens when the injection contains LNPs that can get to your intestines and transform bacteria with these genes?

Why isn't there sequencing QC of every lot given how cheap this is to perform in 2023?

Why QC things when gov is paying & you have a hall pass and a mandate?

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 15

I want thank

@JesslovesMJK

@TheJikky

@SabinehazanMD

@pathogenetics

@VBruttel

@stevenemassey

@Fynnderella1

@hyattjn

for helpful comments on this project

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 15

This molecule wasn't part of the informed consent but each injection likely includes billions of them.

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 15

I don’t even know how to respond.

There is so much gaslighting, Jupiters storm is getting jealous.

>>18363778

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 15

If you are going to inject the population with antibiotic resistance genes, you would wise to have a strong antibiotic discovery program.

https://pfizer.com/science/hot-topics/tackling-antibiotic-resistance

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 16

Some question on the Substack.

There are several stones left unturned in the data as I didn’t want to hold up disclosure of this.

1)do the paired end reads imply linear or circular DNA?

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 16

2)what is the strandedness count? Directional libraries should be able to answer this. Might inform if the vector sequence is DNA or RNA or both.

3) the EMA has limits on the dsRNA and they measure this with some ELISA assay which I’m suspect of?

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

Feb 16

4)error rates in the vector sequence should be lower than in the mRNA as the mRNA goes through a T7 polymerase step with PseudoU and an RT step with PseudoU. There is no PseudoU in the vector.

5)the SV40 in this vector is just a strong promoter. It is not the entire SV40 genome.

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

21h

Is the plasmid sequence DNA or RNA?

DNA will provide sequence from both the watson (antisense) and crick (sense) strands.

mRNA will be sense strand (crick).

We used directional libraries so we can count the sense vs antisense strands.

bitesizebio.com

RNA Strandedness: A Road Travelled In Both Directions

Read on to learn more about RNA strandedness, it's importance in transcriptome profiling, and the best ways to detect.

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

21h

Download the BAM files and run these 2 samtools scripts on it. This will count the Forward and Reverse strands in the data per base across the contig.

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

·

21h

Now put those in excel and subtract the Forward read count from the reverse read count and chart the results.

What do we see? We see a foward strand bias for half the vector and then a sudden shift to a reverse strand bias at position ~2100

Kevin McKernan

@Kevin_McKernan

Thats the exact location of the T7 promoter which initiates synthesis of the mRNA.

This is hard evidence of the vector sequence being DNA and and not an RNA mirage.

The variability in the strandedness in the mRNA region is very interesting? Maybe G4s or other RNA knots?

https://brownstone.org/articles/there-must-be-investigations/

There Must Be Investigations

Eight leading critics of the United States’s COVID-19 response have called for an investigation of the many failures of policy architects and key decision makers — at institutions ranging from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Food and Drug Administration to universities and hospitals — over their repeated mishandling of the pandemic.

Given the immense harm inflicted on our society by the follies of a ruling class and their expert advisers who never failed to make a wrong decision when presented with the opportunity, as well as the fact that lives are still being destroyed by their lingering policies , we can only hope this blueprint does not go ignored.

Dubbing themselves the “Norfolk Group,” the association of scholars includes such prominent names as Stanford epidemiologist Jay Bhattacharya, Harvard epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff, UCSF physician Tracy Beth Høeg, Johns Hopkins University surgeon Marty Makary, and Indiana University School of Medicine immunologist Steven Templeton.

According to the Norfolk Group’s website , although initially organized by Brownstone Institute in May 2022, the eight members of the group have since worked free from outside influence to draft the 80-page document they published earlier this year, “Questions for a COVID-19 Commission.”

Presented as a series of summaries and questions pertaining to key elements of U.S. COVID policy, the document, in effect, lays out a thorough indictment of the consistent incompetence of our ruling class while also raising concerns over the possible influence on policy by special interests such as teachers unions and drug companies.

Regarding natural immunity , the authors ask, “Why did the CDC downplay infection-acquired immunity, despite robust evidence for it?”

In respect to school closures, they ask, “Why were schools and universities closed despite early evidence about the enormous age-gradient in COVID-19 mortality … and early evidence that school closures would cause enormous collateral damage to the education and mental health of children and young adults?”

On that matter, they also wonder, “Why did the CDC incorporate policy language proposed by leaders of teachers unions on the scientific and public health aspects of school reopening without soliciting expertise of outside scientists in public health, infectious diseases, or other related fields?”

When discussing lockdowns , they inquire, “Why was so much influence on public health policy accorded to Drs. [Francis] Collins and [Anthony] Fauci? They control the largest source of infectious disease research funding in the world. How many infectious disease scientists, who should have been strong voices during the pandemic, kept quiet for fear of losing the research funding on which their livelihood depends?”

In their section on epidemiologic modeling , they demand, “Why did world leaders overly rely on models that made unverified assumptions about the pandemic’s trajectory rather than trying to verify these assumptions and their implications?”

p1

>>18363805

When addressing COVID-19 vaccines, they raise questions such as, “Why did many organizations continue with mandates through summer and fall of 2021, despite data demonstrating both waning efficacy of symptomatic infection and reduced long term ability to curb viral spread?”

Regarding masks, they state, “Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the evidence that masks did little if anything to stop the spread of respiratory viruses was uncontroversial,” before summarizing a few studies demonstrating this and asking the obvious: “[W]hy did public health officials and agencies promote the idea that masks would be effective against SARS-CoV2?”

In its entirety, the Norfolk Group’s “Questions for a COVID-19 Commission” serves as a blueprint for the kind of investigation our country needs. Just don’t expect the Biden administration to do anything about it.

Reprinted from Washington Examiner

2 of 2

https://www.hartgroup.org/fauci-confesses-that-covid-vaccines-could-never-have-worked-as-claimed/

Fauci confesses that Covid vaccines could never have worked as claimed

On 11 January 2023 a paper was published in Cell Host & Microbe titled “Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenza viruses, and other respiratory viruses”.

There are just 3 authors, one of whom is Anthony Fauci, who served as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) from 1984 to 2022, and the chief medical advisor to the President from 2021 to 2022.

Fauci is generally regarded as one of the key architects of the USA’s – and therefore the world’s – response to the pandemic, including pushing for the emergency authorisation and rollout of the Covid vaccines, and the formulation of policies which exerted huge pressure on citizens in nearly all countries to be injected with these products or else face sanctions, ranging from social ostracisation via the use of “vaccine passport” schemes, through to job losses, and even fines merely for being unvaccinated.

Fauci made some bold claims about the Covid vaccines in order to justify such coercive policies, including that they would prevent infections and limit transmission of the virus to others. These claims were then picked up by political leaders worldwide and used to justify their own policies, even when – from early data – it became obvious that the vaccines did not prevent infections or reduce the viral load of those infected.

This latest article, therefore, has quite rightly raised some eyebrows because of the astonishing concessions it contains, amongst which are the following:

Of the influenza vaccines, the authors note:

As of 2022, after more than 60 years of experience with influenza vaccines, very little improvement in vaccine prevention of infection has been noted. As pointed out decades ago, and still true today, the rates of effectiveness of our best approved influenza vaccines would be inadequate for licensure for most other vaccine-preventable diseases.

The authors then draw parallels between the vaccines for covid and those for influenza:

The vaccines for these two very different viruses [covid19 and influenza] have common characteristics: they elicit incomplete and short-lived protection against evolving virus variants that escape population immunity.

They propose that the reason why vaccines against covid and influenza are ineffective compared to those against mumps, measles, rubella and smallpox and varicella zoster (chickenpox) is that the former replicate predominantly in local mucosal tissue, without causing viremia.

They posit that the finding by PCR testing of the circulation of viral SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the bloodstream, is an “RNAemia” (as is seen with most mucosal respiratory virus infections), as distinct from viremia, in which infectious viruses can be cultured from the blood.

This statement is rather glossed over, but it actually has huge significance, in that it is essentially saying that the finding by PCR testing of tissues in people with mucosal respiratory virus infections like covid may simply represent the presence of RNA not culturable whole virus.

However, much has been made of these PCR findings, leading to statements that covid is “highly unusual, attacking all tissues” and “covid isn’t just a respiratory disease but a circulatory one”, notions which the authors of this paper seem not to share, the tone of the article being very much that SARS-CoV-2 sits within the broad category of mucosal respiratory viruses.

p1

>>18363816

(Having said that, one point the authors did not make is that even in the absence of circulating whole virus, it could be that circulating spike protein leads to the clots and other vascular pathology seen both in infection and after vaccination, although this seems a likely potential mechanism only in more severe disease.)

They then state that antigenic drift is the reason why we can expect people to be infected multiply both with influenza and SARS-CoV-2.

Tying these all together, they conclude that:

It is not surprising that none of the predominantly mucosal respiratory viruses [of which influenza and SARS-Cov-2 are examples] have ever been effectively controlled by vaccines.

They then write that:

This observation raises a question of fundamental importance: if natural mucosal respiratory virus infections do not elicit complete and long-term protective immunity against reinfection, how can we expect vaccines, especially systemically administered non-replicating vaccines, to do so?

How indeed? This is one of the points that those who questioned the design of the Covid vaccines have been making repeatedly.

In a section which looks like it was written before the (thankfully temporary) purging in 2020 of prior immunology theory and knowledge, they then discuss in some depth the complexity of the highly-evolved mucosal immune response, and the delicate balance that it must (and therefore by implications so must vaccines) achieve between tolerance (preventing tissue damage) and infection control (which may ultimately result in an aberrant immune response).

Some sample extracts:

The immunologic “Faustian bargain” between tolerance versus infection control, which permits transient, moderated infection by respiratory agents of low or intermediate pathogenicity to restrain the destructive forces of an immune elimination response may be problematic for vaccine control of respiratory viruses, not only in the local and systemic sensing of vaccine antigens but also in eliciting optimal immune responses.

The immune system is complex with many effectors. Serum antibody titers to various viral epitopes may only indirectly correlate with protection because of association with other more critical (but not usually measured) immune effectors.

In short, correlations between serum antibody titers and susceptibility to influenza infection may be statistically valid in large studies, but imperfect in the context of individual variation, rapid viral evolution, and waning titers.

A closely related question is whether vaccines that generate immune responses only against single critical epitopes conserved across virus strains and subtypes, or a limited number of such epitopes, can perform as well as vaccines that elicit broad humoral and cell-mediated responses against multiple epitopes. Although such conserved epitopes seem ideal candidates, vaccines based on this approach have not been particularly successful.

p2

>>18363819

>>18363816

Attempting to control mucosal respiratory viruses with systemically administered non-replicating vaccines has thus far been largely unsuccessful, indicating that new approaches are needed.

In summary, this article reads like an admission of failure – of the vaccines to prevent infection and transmission at least. But the most notable point is that the reasons given are based on immunological theory and knowledge which was commonly known before 2020, meaning that the assertions made about them preventing infection and transmission must have been known – or at least strongly suspected – to be untrue. Is this lying? We leave it to the reader to judge.

Even after data emerged which confirmed the inability to block infection and transmission, the voices raising this were suppressed and censored by forces seemingly under the control of US Federal agencies, as we have seen from the “Twitter files” releases.

This article clearly has the “fact checkers” in a bind, as to counter the article’s premises they would have to debunk those who they had previously staunchly defended. Associated Press has published a risible “fact check” which essentially states that the article does not explicitly state that the vaccines do not prevent severe disease, whilst remaining completely silent on the most important concession – the inability to block infection and transmission.

Alex Berenson’s take on this article is also worth a read, as is this piece in The Daily Sceptic by an anonymous senior Pharmaceutical Industry executive.

It remains to be seen whether this Fauci article has any effect on mainstream opinion which seems immobile, despite the weight of accumulating evidence against both the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines.

Another example of former covid vaccine enthusiasts expressing concerns and apparently recanting, but without any mainstream acknowledgement, can be found in an article written by Paul Offit, an American paediatrician specialising in infectious diseases, vaccines, immunology, and virology. Notably, Professor Offit has been a member of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

His article in the prestigious and decidedly establishment journal NEJM titled “Bivalent Covid-19 Vaccines — A Cautionary Tale” raised the worrying spectre of “immune imprinting” (where the immune system becomes fixated on one particular antigenic sequence and therefore less able to deal with variations of the same) and concluded that:

“we should stop trying to prevent all symptomatic infections in healthy, young people by boosting them with vaccines containing mRNA from strains that might disappear a few months later”.

However, this has not been accompanied by any official toning down of the enthusiasm with which the boosters have been recommended by USA Federal officials, although many other countries have essentially stopped offering the vaccines to younger and healthy individuals.

The disconnect between real-world data and the promises made for these vaccines was jarring enough. Now we have previous proponents expressing the same doubts previously censored critics have been raising for years.

When is the mainstream media going to restore much-needed balance to the debate instead of acting as an unquestioning mouthpiece for government?

3 of 3

Former EcoHealth Vice President Andrew Huff says his "attack list" of US food facilities went missing from his personal computer and is being implemented

https://charleswright1.substack.com/p/former-ecohealth-vice-president-andrew?r=12gia8

Andrew Huff is a self-described “whistleblower” who joined EcoHealth in 2014 and left in 2021. You may know him as an author of “The Truth About Wuhan,” one of several books on the Wuhan Institute of Virology and COVID-19.

Huff appeared on the MG Show February 9 to discuss his claims that his “attack list” had disappeared from his personal computer, and that those same places had fallen under attack. He described his background in the military, academia and intelligence:

I’m not your typical infectious disease doctor or academic. I started my career in the US Army as an Infantryman. I was combat deployed during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Degrees are in Psychology, Security Technology Engineering, Geographic Information Systems. My PhD is in environmental health with an infectious disease specialty track, which is public health epidemiology essentially. I did some post-doc work at MIT in complex systems. I was a scientist at Sandia National Laboratories where I was a senior member of the technical staff where I worked on Pandemic preparedness plans, complex models and simulations of disasters and doom and gloom, trying to figure out how we respond to national security threats. My area of expertise was bioterrorism and biowarfare, pandemics and emerging diseases. I got sick of working in the classified space and I went on to work at EcoHealth Alliance.

Somewhere along the way, (I didn’t catch they dates if he said them), Huff created an “attack list” of US food facilities.

I had a highly sensitive national security data set, which I constructed. So I wrote the book on how to attack US food facilities. I was a research fellow at a Department of Homeland Security Center for Excellence on PhD full scholarship. And I started working with the 3-letter agencies on trying to figure out how to protect the American food supply. Well I essentially wrote the book on it. I published all the papers. And I developed the classified attack methods and models which are sitting in the government somewhere. But anyways I had this work, because I began it as a PhD student. I actually had the attack list on my personal drives. And guess what. It went missing.

Not only did Huff’s attack list go missing from his personal computer, he says that these facilities fell under attack.

Look what’s been happening with all of these food facilities attacks over the past year. And here’s the craziest, and I was tweeting about this today (Feb 9, 2023), so I analyzed the attack facilities versus that target list, and it’s almost a perfect match. The probability of that happening- zero.

Huff went into some greater detail about the origin of the food facility attack list.

The way that this worked was that a couple of other research scientists, military experts, and myself, they went around the country collecting the data from states and industries. So they would have meetings and sent the experts down to people who owned all the food in the United States - it was a massive project. And then they’d have them walk them through was called - it’s called a modified delta method if you want to get nerdy. But what that means is they’re using subject matter experts to collect all the different risk, threat, vulnerability, and attack data, including methods of attack on the system. So, for example, they would go to someone in the chicken production industry, broilers you’d buy in the grocery store, and they’d say, hypothetically speaking, if someone was to attack your food system or your facility, what would be the most catastrophic thing that could happen? And they’d tell you. You know like burn it down, you destroy it, you poison the chickens, you use a zoonotic disease, you use a chemical agent, and there’s a whole list of different things you could use. And then you’d ask well what’s the magnitude of this impact, and what kind of impact would it have on the country? So all that data- gone. So it’s basically a roadmap of how to attack US food facilities and systems.

p1

>>18363838

Huff said that he reported the missing food facility attack list to several government agencies, including the FBI, DHS, FDA, and Representative Brad Wenstrup (Ohio) of the House Intelligence Committee.

I recently had a brief discussion with Huff on Twitter before he blocked me. On Feb 5, I told him I would buy a copy of his book if he said anything about Michael Callahan and his Chinese colleagues.

The role of Michael Callahan in China, a self-described bioterrorism expert who testified to Congress that was deeply involved with biowarfare scientists in the former Soviet Union, and was routinely called by said scientists when they had lab leaks, is one of the many “elephants in the room” that the media refuses to discuss.

I was trying to keep an open mind on Huff as a “whistleblower” at this point. EcoHealth Alliance is one of the most evil organizations in the history of mankind. The primary purpose of EcoHealth Alliance was to collect, modify, and transfer viruses from one bat species to another all over the world to simulate a natural evolution of pathogenic viruses that would later “spill over” and could be blamed on nature. Maybe he didn’t know that, but when he said that “The Callahan story is false” and that “He was not sneaking into Chinese hospitals” because Callahan was “white,” I thought that was either extremely stupid or deceptive. So I reminded him that one of EcoHealth Alliance’s own white guys, Ian Lipkin, actually set up China’s version of a CDC after SARS1. (1). As a former VP of EcoHealth, and a “PhD … in environmental health with an infectious disease specialty track,” I think Huff should know about the history of white guy Ian Lipkin and China, and I don’t like the way he dismissed Callahan’s reported presence in Wuhan Central Hospital without any reason other than his race.

p2

>>18363843

>>18363838

Maybe I pissed him off on Feb 5, but he didn’t block me at this point. He blocked me after I made a few comments about the methods by which fires at food facilities might be set.

I’ve been thinking about the wicked applications of directed-energy weapons for many years. Starting fires is just one of these applications. Every fire season in the US, which seem to keep getting worse, I always think about these weapons. On this day, Feb 12, at 2:42 PM, it just so happened that the United States shot down another “unidentified object” at 20,000 feet over Lake Huron, Michigan. This object had no visible propulsion system. I figure it was powered by electromagnetism or something similar. It also crossed my mind that it could possibly have been a directed-energy weapon. I don’t know but how can we rule that out without an explanation?

Huff first replied that he thought the fires were started by “arson or cyber attack.” Then he blocked my on Twitter. I’m not saying it’s related.

Around this time on February 12, a Twitter narrative “why are we talking about UFO’s when we should be talking about the environmental disaster in Ohio?” really picked up.

And while I certainly concur that the environmental disaster is a huge concern that should be discussed and reported, I hardly think that unidentified objects over your head are a distraction. I can consider two things in the course of a day myself. I didn’t tell anyone not to talk about Ohio. Directed energy weapons can start fires, they can warp train tracks, they can make people drop dead without a trace. I’m not saying that’s been happening, but it could be happening.

Congress needs to demand answers on exactly what the objects shot down were and what their propulsion systems were.

Charles Wright

(1). Columbia.edu, China Honors Ian Lipkin, January 07, 2020.

At the height of the SARS outbreak in 2003, Lipkin was invited by senior Chinese scientists and officials to assess the state of the epidemic, identify gaps in science, and develop a strategy for containing the virus and curtailing infections and deaths. Once the outbreak was contained, Lipkin helped develop the institutional infrastructure to ensure China would have the resources to detect and more rapidly respond to emerging infectious threats, in part through building the Institut Pasteur in Shanghai, new national Centers for Disease Control in Beijing, and the Guangzhou Institute of Biomedicine and Health. Today, he continues to consult with the Ministry of Science and Technology, the Chinese Academy of Science, and the Ministry of Health. He has also served as a consultant for a climate change program at Beijing Normal and as a visiting professor at Beijing University. Last year, the Chinese Academy of Sciences awarded funding for a collaborative project between CII and Sun Yat-Sen University in zoonotic diseases. Since 2003, Lipkin has presented more than 20 lectures in China, notably including the inaugurations of the Institut Pasteur de Shanghai in 2004 and the Beijing Center for Infectious Diseases two years later. In 2016, he was honored with the China International Science and Technology Cooperation Award, presented in the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, presided by President Xi Jinping.

3 of 3

https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/local/capitol-watch/idaho-lawmakers-introduce-legislation-to-criminalize-those-who-administer-covid-vaccines-legislature/277-2436a514-e7da-4b31-9762-f9be10300075

Idaho lawmakers introduce legislation to criminalize those who administer COVID vaccines

IDAHO, USA — Two Idaho lawmakers have introduced a bill to charge those who administer mRNA vaccines with a misdemeanor.

Sen. Tammy Nichols, R-Middleton, and Rep. Judy Boyle, R-Midvale, sponsored HB 154. It was introduced in the House Health & Welfare Committee on Feb. 15 by Nichols. According to the bill text, "A person may not provide or administer a vaccine developed using messenger ribonucleic acid technology for use in an individual or any other mammal in this state."

That person would then be charged with a misdemeanor.

Nichols said during her presentation to the committee, "We have issues this was fast tracked."

Nichols said there is no liability, informed consent or data on mRNA vaccines. She later clarified she was referring to the two COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna.

"I think there is a lot of information that comes out with concerns to blood clots and heart issues," Nichols said.

Rep. Ilana Rubel, D-Boise, questioned Nichols' statement that the vaccines were fast-tracked. She said her understanding was that the vaccines were approved and survived the testing, later approved by the FDA.

Nichols said she is finding it "may not have been done like we thought it should've been done."

"There are other shots we could utilize that don't have mRNA in it," Nichols said.

MRNA is a molecule that assists in making proteins. The COVID-19 vaccines, which are known as mRNA vaccines, help your body make proteins that mimic the COVID virus to help bodies fight off the infection, according to John Hopkins Medicine.

MRNA was discovered in the early 1960's, John Hopkins states. Some were used to fight the Ebola virus. Researchers are also currently working to use mRNA to prevent other respiratory viruses.

The bill requires a future vote in the committee to pass onto the House floor for debate.

The bill would make administering an mRNA vaccine a COVID vaccine a misdemeanor.

https://mobile.twitter.com/LeadingReport/status/1625341096254373890

Leading Report

@LeadingReport

BREAKING: Tennessee legislators have filed a proposal to prohibit the mRNA vaccine in food products.

>>18363897

Notable

>>18363975

The FDA dictates the maximum allowable adulterants and toxins in the food and drug supply. It does not attempt to block them entirely, but merely to deem products 'fit for human consumption'. And if paid enough, everything passes. See Johnson & Johnson Talcum powder, Merck's Vioxx, etc etc.

Re: pharmakeia, the FDA, NIH, and CDC are parallel, subordinate agencies to the United States Department of Health and Human Services. thus why they always support/approve each other in 'lockstep'

>>18363919

>>18364099

https://www.nme.com/news/back-to-the-future-writer-reveals-biff-tannen-was-inspired-by-donald-trump-2560286

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-is-biff-tannen_n_5627978be4b0bce347031f84

https://outsider.com/entertainment/back-to-futures-biff-tannen-modeled-donald-trump-michael-j-fox-compares/

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/back-to-the-future-writer-biff-is-donald-trump-190408/

https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/michael-j-fox-trump-biff-back-to-the-future-b1760681.html

>>18364104

>countermoves

?donde estan?