>>18366445

"LaVaughn"?

Hmmmm…

Just great.

"Co-Pilotorb"

is shitting up the board.

Anyone got any good info or theories about the "rainbows" rising to form a "sheen" on the waters surface, after disturbing the creek beds in Ohio?

>>18366553

No shit, Sherlock.

But do you think it is from this train derailment incident?

I DO NOT.

I believe it is petroleum, and may have been there for quite while.

>>18366557

Well played, anon; Well played!

KEK

>>18366568

Yes.

But WHERE dis the oil come from?

Oil floats on water.

WHY, then, did the bottom need to be "disturbed"?

>>18366579

>>18366583

VERY GOOD anon!

NOW we're getting somewhere.

>>18366586

Probable because Gasoline DOES NOT "MIX" with water.

>>18366587

ONLY when another product ("CONTAMINANT") has FIRST been introduced.

>>18366589

If it is "heavier", then WHY DID IT FLOAT?

>>18366644

OK Einstein…

Stuff on the bottom - "Heavier" or "Lighter" than Water?

WHY would it suddenly RISE to the surface if it was "heavier"?

Conversely, WHY would it be SUBMERGED if it was "lighter"?

I'll wait til you put your broken brain back together.

>>18366652

Straight?

Or should it be "MIXED" with water?

DOUCHE.

>>18366671

Then over time, they should sink to the bottom again.

Right?

WRONG.

>>18366776

OK. Sounds plausible.

I am aware of the use of ABSORBANTS (saw dust and kitty-litter are two examples)

I am also aware of the processes of "CONTAINMENT and RECOVERY".

>>18366841

Yes, BUT "HEAVY" oils WILL NOT FLOAT ON WATER.

>>18366832

>>>18366550 (You), >>18366553, >>18366571 (You), >>18366588 (You), >>18366644, >>18366579Erinanons Bruhkovichs asking questions

YOU'RE A DICK.

>>18366883

No.

>>18366893

Dawn (dishwashing liquid) is considered to be a "dispersant".

>>18366895

>class action lawsuit incoming

Maybe another Trump Hotel and golf course, too!

>>18366912

(I didn't get the reference)

>>18366940

Mememakers Request:

Side-by-side with the red buttons:

"FUCK THE FEDS!"/ "WHERE ARE THE FUCKIN' FEDS?"

>>18366950

TY anon!

(THIS anon doesn't watch TV)

But yes, it does break down oils.

>>18366949

I'll have to disagree on the last part.

>>18366974

Thanks.

But I'm more of an "IDEA" guy.

(ZERO "artistic" ability)

I'll leave it to the pros, or the willing amateurs.

I just find it amusing that while so many claim to want less government, they are begging for big government intervention.

THEY WILL NEVER LEARN.

>>18367015

TY anon.

WADR, to the baker comparing anon to "Erin Brockovich", I'll excuse you.

>>18367024

There is always a massive push to make a big deal out of oil spills and the ensuing clean-up.

Otherwise, it would just "go away" (i.e. dissipate back into the environment, over time).

(THEY don't want THAT dirty little secret getting out!)

>>18367077

TY anon!

(I'm putting you in for a promotion!)

07