Anonymous ID: 8f57c1 Feb. 17, 2023, 2:41 p.m. No.18366457   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6460 >>6467 >>6479

>>18366430

Yup. For some strange reason that meme became a symbol to them that they had to tear down like a confederate statue. They assumed I put my identity in an array of pixels. They chose poorly. My personality, what guides my words and motivation, not some 1s and 0s arranged into an image, is my identity and that is something that can never be taken down or destroyed. I'm beginning to think their goal is to ruin the idea of me posting that pepe just like I ruin their use of ethnic accusation, racial division spam that they went with for five years that went nowhere. I find it funny as fuck that they're so intent to tear me down. But, as long as I am their target, they're too busy to go with the regular spam they've gone with for half a decade.

Anonymous ID: 8f57c1 Feb. 17, 2023, 2:46 p.m. No.18366477   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6493 >>6499

>>18366460

I rotate memes regularly, and have over the years, but I discovered one particular that gets under their skin. That inflames their choleric tempers just by posting it. That makes them rage and whine and lash out irrationally. You're telling me I should stop using that? KEK. I don't think so.

Anonymous ID: 8f57c1 Feb. 17, 2023, 2:49 p.m. No.18366491   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6502 >>6507

>>18366479

So, you begin my telling me it's not about me then go on to say it is? Irrational. If it's not about me then you should have no problem with it. If any Anon has a problem with it they can filter me; I couldn't care less if they did. I don't require approval of my peers, nor require them to hold me in check. Q is the only one that can put me back in my cage now. I will accept no substitute.

Anonymous ID: 8f57c1 Feb. 17, 2023, 2:56 p.m. No.18366517   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6601

>>18366502

>reading comprehension fail.

Oh. Let's examine that claim, shall we?

>wasn't about you bro, just that one faggot who has beef with you

So you start off with saying it wasn't about me, it was about the guy who has beef.

> you and that other guy are in bed together with your egos

So, which is it? Is it about him or is it about me as well?

Tell me again how my reading comprehension sucks. It's not the first time I've been attacked, nor the last I'm sure. If my "ego" is not your cup of tea then, I say again, filter me.

Anonymous ID: 8f57c1 Feb. 17, 2023, 2:59 p.m. No.18366529   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6566

>>18366493

>diversification does not mean abandonmentโ€ฆ

True. There is a concerted push though to get me not to post that particular Pepe. To destroy a "board personality" and "ego." It's not about taking those things down, it's about breaking someone's spirit, and that will never happen. Ever. But Anons are more than welcome to try along with the shills as well if it will make their egos comfy.

Anonymous ID: 8f57c1 Feb. 17, 2023, 3:46 p.m. No.18366784   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6962

>>18366507

You've gotten on my nerves sometimes, quite a few times actually, but you're a'ight. I look at some of our past back and forths as sparring as opposed to attacking each other. I'm sticking with my first impression I have of you, as I learned a lesson on second guessing those a year or two ago.