>>18374544

perfect example of the difference between facts and theory.

science is the marriage of the two, but sometimes the husband gets blamed for the wife's shortcomings.

FACT: people are more apt to miss typos when they proofread their own composition.

THEORY: all the psychobabble bullshit contained in

>https://www.businessinsider.in/The-Neuroscience-y-Reason-You-Cant-Spot-Your-Own-Typos/articleshow/40420652.cms

whenever anyone feels the urge to condemn "science," pls remember this important distinction.

EXPERIMENTALISTS: make observations and collect cold hard facts.

THEORETICIANS: make up bullshit stories to "woman'splain" those facts.

facts are facts.

bullshit is bullshit.

don't throw the baby out with the bathwater.

>>18372125 pb

>Dioxin, one of the most toxic chemicals known to man, active ingredient of agent orange

anons… dioxin is NOT the "active ingredient" of agent orange, or anything else for that matter. it is a TRACE CONTAMINANT, an unwanted byproduct of the chemical reactions employed to synthesize 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, the ACTUAL ingredients of agent orange.

whenever scientifically ILLITERATE tards start sperging total bullshit, what they're REALLY doing is DISCREDITING the people who raise legitimate concerns. IDK, maybe THAT is their intention, maybe they're just tards. either way, STOP HELPING THEM by repeating bullshit w/o first verifying simple facts.

and referring to it as "one of the most toxic chemicals known to man" is just retarded HYPE, and reeks of madison ave advertizing, or MSM reporting tactics. yes, it IS nasty stuff, but that statement is patently absurd. how does one even rank toxins that kill by radically different mechanisms, some instantaneous, some that require decades to develop into cancers or other fatal maladies? shit like that serves ONLY to sensationalize, and thereby further DISCREDIT valid concerns.

STOP IT.

>>18374622

>Carter - yes, on the team, fully controlled

FALSE. absolutely FALSEfringe member of team until elected, yes, then after in office, uncontrollable. that is why they worked so hard to destroy him. "Nightline" was created for the SOLE PURPOSE of humiliating him daily. EVERY nightly installment opened with the running count of "Good evening, it's day nnn of the Iranian hostage crisis." a crisis THEY created, first by CIA asset GHWB travelling to iran to negotiate arms deals that were contingent on the iranians KEEPING the hostages until after the election of ronnie raygun, and then sending a US black ops team to shoot down our own helos carrying marines on a mission to extract the hostages. the hostages later ALL swore affadavits stating that they were loaded onto a passenger jet which sat idling on the runway, while IRGC soldiers listened to raygun's inauguration on satellite radio. at the exact moment raygun said "i do" the signal was given for the plane to take off.

CARTER WAS AND IS A GOOD GUY

>>18374598

> concur

"Mathematicians may say anything they please. Physicists must be at least partly sane." – J. Willard Gibbs

>>18374674

>He just did stoopid shit like SES

carter instructed CONGRESS to draft laws to reform the civil service act of 1912, and make the gov't agencies MORE accountable to we the people. don't blame carter for the the bullshit congress did.

>>18374696

>Ronald Reagan has a superhero chest!

ronnie raygun was a D-list fourth rate actor, and on his best day about as bright as a 3W bulb. by the time he was elected president, raygun was a senile sockpuppet, selected to install GHWB as president by sucession after raygun was assassinated by MKUltra asset hinkley, son of bush's neighbor. but RR threw a monkey wrench into the plans by not dying. even so, afterward, he was a figurehead only, and let GHWB run the show behind the scenes.

>>18374710

you're an idiot. you no NOTHING about history or carter, just what you're brainwashed neocontard indoctrination tells you.