Anonymous ID: 647fec Feb. 19, 2023, 7:39 a.m. No.18375820   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18375806

>>18375812

how do I file a claim?

oh ya, you're the3 lazy crap baker who doesn't type out the full words.

hello smoochey baker

 

FYI:

to claim

for claiming: available for claiming

to claim: available to make a claim

 

but you know all this. you devolve the language to train people to forget to say things clearly.

your insipidness is noted.

Anonymous ID: 647fec Feb. 19, 2023, 7:41 a.m. No.18375833   🗄️.is 🔗kun

remember the bakers rotate between

fake personas.

one type is the 'everyone here is my captive' type

the other type is 'I wuv you all, be a degenarate with me'

 

and occasionally they actually pretend to care about anon and Q drops.

 

this is a 'fren' zone: fake comrades

Anonymous ID: 647fec Feb. 19, 2023, 7:53 a.m. No.18375871   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5882 >>5889

>>18375858

if they ban it then it will show up again and it will brag about it.

'see this is not really a free speech zone' it will say.

the bad part is that it disrupts my processes here because

I'd just filter it and not see it, but it makes such a big mess with everything, and causes such a stir, it's better to be situationally aware of it's presence.

but, ya, it will eventually become too much of a pest and the other bkaers will not want to contend with it's constant harrassing and will probably do what isn't really a good thing to do, ban it.

it won't matter, it will just reappear with a different IP.

Anonymous ID: 647fec Feb. 19, 2023, 8:05 a.m. No.18375914   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18375909

for me it's recognizing the poison personalities and giving them no headway in their malcontentions and misinformative banties of shilling.

I don't even bother to pretend that you said anything you believe in, anon. you quip bad advice in the form on conundroms and I'm smart enough to not try to debunk your blather.

Anonymous ID: 647fec Feb. 19, 2023, 8:09 a.m. No.18375928   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6039

>>18375923

when they post the subliminal satanism I tend to just shut off images. If I didn't think that it was a shill-fest here, I wouldn't bother.

when lounge-lizzard shill is in the bread, it's best to shut off images.

Anonymous ID: 647fec Feb. 19, 2023, 8:17 a.m. No.18375947   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18375936

one might conjecture that they bugged out

and then came back after two months claiming

"we were down there the whole time"

 

how heroic: cowardly hide instead of dealing with the issue that so manymany people think

"yours is an illegitimate government,

the people in power aren't vote in with fair counts of votes cast."

and even expressing that other have doubts, as I do, is called 'denying'

 

so where were they really in those two months?

eating secret food in a secret bunker?

or off cowering into hiding, or setting up alternative lives for themselves in Ohio or somewhere safer.

 

the whole 'oh the heroes of Ukraine' narrative is beat.

I'm tired of it.

it's not heroic to hide in a hole

when you should be out doing diplomacy.

Anonymous ID: 647fec Feb. 19, 2023, 8:44 a.m. No.18376038   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6062

the battle of the loathsome memes is missed

if you filter only a few anon.

the rest don't seem to care or want to see it

and do not enjoy it.

but strangely don't care about Mr. Pig memes even though they did become annoying for a time, and might welcome them.

but the newer generation trying to be the next Mr Pig?

 

they must not remember . . .

(because they were not even here)

that Mr. Pig wasn't welcomed either but

just maintained a

loving (loving?) oh kay, a not hateful point of view.

 

the hateful point of view thing is what puts me off to a namephags calling card images.

and spamming a theme of an ancient meme with various Mad-magazine quality art-work heads, that are overly crafted and obvious efforts of a paid-for artist (with some talent in drawing but lacking talent in editing and filtering the good from the bad.

hateful images designed to bring loathing are NOT memes and

those who spam them are obvious and glowing so . . .

regular people see it once at the top of the bread and filter it.

but they act as if it's causing a tidal wave on a great big ocean, some dark-squall at a mountain precipice overlooking the wide and raging sea . . .

but instead it's a janitor in a drum, and Carol just hit the flush and

away he goes .

Anonymous ID: 647fec Feb. 19, 2023, 8:48 a.m. No.18376062   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18376038

my memory is a bit dyslexic and

it was a tidy bowl man parody with

Lyle playing the guy in a tiny row boat

and Carol hitting the flush button and

of course they had to use a different name than tidy bowl.

 

the anon filter like carol would hit the flush in that bit from her show.

Anonymous ID: 647fec Feb. 19, 2023, 9:43 a.m. No.18376330   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6342 >>6349 >>6360 >>6489

>>18376315

just as I predicted they post the degeneracy until there is some kind of ban, and then they brag about it.

banning senseless repetitive content on a private research board is not censorship.

the people who post this stuff don't do it to give out ideas, but to instead badger and harrass. the content as spammed (as spammed) results in speech-supression.

and thus that content which you spam to get banned is actually the attempt at censorship of those who are harrassed into not posting, or whose posts are spammed with hateful images and they get harrassed by a nonsense shill.

 

you post to revulse and then brag when you get banned. what a jerk!

Anonymous ID: 647fec Feb. 19, 2023, 9:58 a.m. No.18376410   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6431

>>18376402

your too pompous to pull off entreats to humility.

what you display is a typical narcissism of pretense to knowing what's best, and a psychotic bend to burn down other people's efforts without cause, which is always hostile, and certain like taking a bullet-train to purgatory.

Anonymous ID: 647fec Feb. 19, 2023, 10:20 a.m. No.18376507   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18376431

?literally?

what do you mean inserting that caveot?

why does what do you call it? pure-devine ?

what does that need literacy for?

as far as 'my eyes'

you accost my eyes with horrid mean memes when you can get away with it.

so that makes no sense?

open eyes?

 

why even use eyes? does , what do you call it, pure devine love? that has tohave eyes too?

so it needs words and eyes?

 

that's your assumptions

so then blind or mute people who have no eyes and don't use words are ? ? ?

not part of it?

 

I describe what you do here and how I conjecture that it makes anon feel.

you could tell me valid things: I don't speak for the anon, how would I know this stuff about how they feel about you? I conjecture.

but instead you go into a bogus discussion of what you called 'pure devine love' and

I know what you are pretending to be but obviously you know you aren't really that, and what you do is larping.

I just tell you how you come off and make up what I imagine the anon think about it. You could get me on that, but insted you larp off into the 'all are won' larp and 'devine love' that is 'pure', like there would be any other kind.

 

anyway

 

you make up emotions for me and it's just you

making up a fiction.