COVID TRANSFER

Canada #40 >>18289944

Everything You Need To Know About The Lab Leak (But Were Not Allowed To Ask)

by Tyler Durden Sunday, Feb 05, 2023 - 12:00 AM

Authored by Pat Fidopiastis via The Brownstone Institute,

Between 2014 and 2019, US tax dollars were funneled to the Wuhan Institute of Virology via EcoHealth Alliance. Given that US scientists have far more virology expertise than the Chinese, this begs an obvious question: what type of research were US tax dollars paying for in Wuhan, China? Dr. Fauci’s surprising statement in an interview might provide the short answer to this question: “You don’t want to go to Hoboken, NJ or Fairfax, VA to be studying the bat-human interface that might lead to an outbreak, so you go to China.”

Given what we’ve endured for the past three years, Fauci’s “so you go to China” comment suggests that he hadn’t considered the global implications of a highly transmissible coronavirus leaking from a Chinese lab plagued by serious safety issues.

Unwilling to admit that he, EcoHealth Alliance, and their Chinese collaborators, are suspects in one of the largest crimes against humanity, Fauci instead opted to conspire with his boss, Francis Collins, to declare “lab leak” a “destructive conspiracy” that must be “put down.” Sadly, it’s clear that from the beginning, these two distinguished scientists made up their minds about virus origin without evidence from both sides of the debate.

Even worse, renowned scientists that rely on Fauci for their research funding, fearful of sanctions being placed on their life’s work, rallied around the “anti-lab leak” stance. One of the premier scientific journals, Science, whose political bias has become very apparent, attempted to provide legitimacy to Fauci’s position by publishing a paper by authors that claimed “dispositive evidence” that SARS-CoV-2 emerged from an animal at the Wuhan market. This paper allegedly “crushed” the lab-leak hypothesis, despite leaving much room for debate.

The good news is that Big Tech, scientific journals, and most media sources were forced to stop censoring countervailing evidence as it reached critical mass and began spilling over into the public domain. Far from being a “conspiracy,” there is a lot of evidence that strongly suggests SARS-CoV-2 is an engineered virus that spread from a Wuhan virology lab. Before getting into the evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered and leaked from a lab, let’s start a debate around the “dispositive evidence” that SARS-CoV-2 is natural and emerged from the Wuhan market.

The “market origin hypothesis” is based on four debatable premises

The entirety of the “dispositive evidence” for market origin cited by Dr. Fauci and others can be summed up as follows: 1) “Early” cases allegedly lived near the market, 2) “early” SARS-CoV-2 lineages were allegedly associated with the market, 3) wild animals susceptible to COVID-19 were sold at the market, and 4) positive SARS-CoV-2 samples were found in the environment around the market and were allegedly “linked to human cases.” For many reasons, some of which are discussed here, none of this evidence is anywhere near “dispositive.” This is why reviewers forced the authors to remove the phrase “dispositive evidence” as a requirement for publication.

Did “early cases” really live near the market?

The Science paper relied on a joint World Health Organization (WHO)-China report to define “early cases” as those that occurred in December 2019. However, the joint WHO-China report also states: “Based on molecular sequence data, the results suggested that the outbreak may have started sometime in the months before the middle of December 2019.”

This statement seems more in line with other evidence that the pandemic started earlier than December 2019. Urgent communications from the highest levels of the Chinese government circulating at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in November 2019 reported a “complex and grave situation” at the lab. Was this “grave situation” the start of a SARS-CoV-2 “lab leak” unfolding in real -time, weeks before the rest of the world was made aware of the imminent pandemic?

There were also multiple reports from Chinese media and even the venerable Lancet that documented initial cases started before December 2019, as well as lab-based evidence of international spread as early as November 2019. Furthermore, shouldn’t we be alarmed that a group led by Chinese military scientists applied for a COVID-19 vaccine patent in February 2020?

More:

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/everything-you-need-know-about-lab-leak-were-not-allowed-ask

Canada #40 >>18290208

The Draft of the WHO Pandemic Treaty Promises to Equally Destroy Your Rights

https://www.truth11.com/untitled-821/

The most current draft of the pandemic treaty, released publicly on February 1, is big on “equality.” To make it clear, the writers don’t want anyone to feel left out — small countries, Third World countries, marginalized populations — we are all equal in the face of the Mighty Germ and its Countermeasures.

This equality stuff is taken to extremes, however. Let’s take a look at Article 14, titled Protection of Human Rights. As the whole concept of a “one size fits all” global treaty to mandate uniform responses to a centrally declared pandemic is utterly at odds with the very concept of human rights, I sat up and started paying close attention.

What Article 14 seems to be proposing is that we will all have our rights violated EQUALLY and with EQUITY under this global One Health system. So if you are black, transgender, disabled or indigenous, the treaty will ensure that the restrictions and violations of your rights take place … EQUITABLY.

Continued at source, pdf of Article 14 attached at original Canada post

Canada #40 >>18290619

On Covid-19 and beyond, Western democracies are deploying military-grade propaganda to fight dissent

New revelations show how the UK and Canada used army psyops units to target ‘disinformation’

3 Feb, 2023

Thanks to a whistleblower, we now know that critics of Covid-19-related lockdowns and vaccine mandates — including prominent journalists and politicians — were monitored by the UK army’s information warfare brigade.

One of the military units reportedly deployed in the activity was the 77th Brigade, created in 2015 and described by the media at the time as comprised of “warriors who don't just carry weapons, but who are also skilled in using social media such as Twitter and Facebook, and the dark arts of "psyops" - psychological operations.”

These big guns — backed by artificial intelligence surveillance tools — were trained on experts and authoritative voices who deviated from the conventional Covid-related narratives promoted by the state, with the collected data used to craft government propaganda. As we now know, any dissent during this period was often dismissed as disinformation, quashing legitimate scientific debate along with conspiracy theories and harmful misconceptions. Pre-Covid, it had emerged that an executive in charge of European editorial at Twitter was also serving as a part-time officer of the 77th Brigade. And apparently Twitter didn’t have a problem with that.

We already knew from former US intelligence community contractor Edward Snowden that domestic spying by Western governments was rampant. But these latest revelations now indicate that the data is being weaponized and turned back on the same citizens for the purpose of imposing groupthink and portraying anyone who doesn’t fit into their intellectual straitjacket as crazy.

And the UK is hardly an anomaly in the Western world. The Canadian military was also caught using propaganda techniques honed on the battlefield in Afghanistan to shape the Covid debate. The military figured that it was “needed to head off civil disobedience by Canadians during the coronavirus pandemic and to bolster government messages,” according to the Ottawa Citizen, citing an internal army investigation. Launched in April 2020, the army claimed to have shut it down, but the newspaper has recently revealed that the Canadian military is still financing social media information and data collection operations to the tune of millions of dollars invested in the military industrial complex, for Canadians to spy on themselves, apparently so they can be better brainwashed by their own government under the guise of national security.

A report published last December by the Associated Press found that the Covid crisis permitted the expansion of this kind of global surveillance, with police in multiple countries — including Australia, Israel, India, and the US — using “technologies and data to halt travel for activists and ordinary people, harass marginalized communities and link people’s health information to other surveillance and law enforcement tools. In some cases, data was shared with spy agencies.”

It’s not like the folks who are supposed to be focused on protecting the homeland from actual threats to life and limb, rather than just from opinions that diverge from the government diktat, are going to just begin and end with Covid, either. Last June, the Canadian Armed Forces Tweeted: “We’re working with international partners to detect, correct, and call out the Kremlin’s state-sponsored disinformation about Ukraine.”

Last April, US President Joe Biden tried to create a new “Disinformation Governance Board” under the Department of Homeland Security, headed up by a former communications advisor to the Ukrainian foreign ministry — a move so grotesquely biased that the whole project was eventually scrapped. That doesn't mean that domestic information warfare activities have stopped, though. DHS came into existence itself under the pretext of better coordinating national security for the global war on terror. And now that surveillance arsenal is used on citizens who merely have different views. Twitter file releases under new owner, Elon Musk, have shed light on the cozy relationship between government officials — including those working for the Pentagon, CIA, and FBI – and big US social media outlets like Twitter, which routinely cooperated on certain narratives about geopolitical competitors (like Russia) under the guise of fighting “disinformation”.

More:

https://www.rt.com/news/570875-army-psyops-uk-canada/

Canada #40 >>18294728

85% of vaccine “adverse effects” in military were due to Covid-19 shot

https://tnc.news/2023/02/05/vaxx-effects-caf/

Data provided by the federal government shows that Covid shots made up a vast majority of “adverse effects” due to vaccination reported in the Canadian military.

As first revealed by Blacklock’s Reporter, 131 of 154 total adverse reactions that happened in 2021 was due to Covid-19 vaccines.

The numbers were reported by the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) in response to an Inquiry of Ministry filed by Conservative MP Cheryl Gallant who requested the data on vaccine-related injuries in the military.

“Armed Forces health services tracks adverse events following immunization,” wrote cabinet. “An adverse event is any unexpected medical event.”

Military personnel were given a variety of vaccines. In total 19 different shots were reported including for polio, rabies, yellow fever and Covid-19, among others. Continue…

Continued at source

Canada #40 >>18295035

UK Regulator Finds Pfizer Guilty of Violating Three Sections of the British Pharmaceuticals Code of Practice

February 6, 2023 7:30 am by Jim Hoft

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/uk-regulator-finds-pfizer-guilty-violating-three-sections-british-pharmaceuticals-code-practice/

A complaint against Pfizer pharmaceutical was filed to the UK’s Prescription Medicines Code of Practice Authority (PMCPA), the regulator responsible for policing promotions of prescription medicines in the UK.

The complaint centered on an interview that was conducted by a medical editor at the BBC, in which Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla made comments that were “misleading” about COVID shots for children. On December 2, 2021, this interview also appeared on the BBC website under the category “Health.”

Children’s Health Defense reported:

In the BBC interview, Bourla said it was up to the regulatory agencies to determine whether to approve and distribute vaccines to children under 11, but he thought that “immunising that age group in the UK and Europe would be a very good idea,” according to the PMCPA case report published last week.

At the time, no COVID-19 vaccines had been approved by the U.K.’s Medicines and Health products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) for children under 12, so the panel found Bourla’s comments were in breach of code.

Citing possible disruptions in schooling and the potential for long COVID, Bourla also said, “So, there was no doubt in my mind that the benefits completely were in favour of doing it [vaccinating children against COVID-19].”

He added, “I believe it’s a good idea.”

The panel found these strong opinion statements could lead the public to infer there was no need to be concerned with potential side effects or that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks, which had not been determined by the health authorities.

The complaint was filed on Dec. 11, 2021 by Us For Them, “a parent-led campaign group calling for children’s needs to be prioritized during the Covid pandemic response.”

Click here for the TGP discounts page at MyPillow - use promo code TGP to benefit Gateway Pundit and get huge discounts!

The Us For Them organization believes that children “must be placed front and center in all decisions impacting them. The wellbeing of children should be a guiding principle of public policy making.”

More:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/uk-regulator-finds-pfizer-guilty-violating-three-sections-british-pharmaceuticals-code-practice/

Canada #40 >>18298432

Injuries from the COVID-19 Vaccine Are Now Being Publicly Displayed in Canada Using Trucks Driving Down the Street – Join the Campaign!

Since the launch of the COVID-19 vaccine in Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) reported that 52,203 adverse events had been documented in its system.

The Liberal government led by Justin Trudeau paid up almost $2.8 million in compensation for injuries incurred as a result of the experimental Covid-19 jabs.

There were a total of 1,299 claims that were submitted to the Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP) between June 2021 and December 1, 2022.

So far, Health Canada has approved 50 claims of serious and permanent injuries caused by vaccines.

While 209 were deemed ineligible because they lacked the required information or did not match the eligibility criteria.

The VISP reported that, of the remaining claims, 221 claims had been fully examined by the program’s medical review board, 48 claims are awaiting medical review board examination, and 662 claims are in the process of gathering medical records.

“These claims represent cases where it has been determined by the Medical Review Board that there is a probable link between the injury and the vaccine, and that the injury is serious and permanent,” according to the program.

The YANA, “You Are Not Alone ” campaign has launched in Ontario, Canada to spread awareness about the danger of the COVID-19 vaccines.

“Our first truck, showcasing Meredith, rolled onto the streets in Ontario on Thursday, January 19, 2023,” an entry on its website reads.

“There are many of us who understand what you’re going through—we’ve grown into a very supportive community. Stay strong—share your stories—we’ll heal together,” said Meredith.

The YANA, “You Are Not Alone ” campaign has been launched!!! To bring awareness, bring down the stigma on injuries to the inoculations. If you would like to have a decal on your trailer or want to sponsor this awareness campaign,please apply here! https://t.co/5KxaYuaXu7 pic.twitter.com/ihwGQtRVz1

— CAERS (@CAERSinfo) February 3, 2023

More:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/injuries-covid-19-vaccine-now-publicly-displayed-canada-using-trucks-driving-street-join-campaign/

Canada #40 >>18307147

Two day health conference focuses on empowerment and democracy

https://www.rebelnews.com/two_day_health_conference_focuses_on_empowerment_and_democracy

Epidemiologist and former Trump senior advisor Paul Elias Alexander reiterated how the government response caused more harm than good with faulty public health measures that were never based on science or evidence of efficacy.

The United Health Conference took place on February 4-5 at Toronto's Sheraton Centre and included a wide range of speakers from various walks of life.

It was put on by a peer networking group called Justice for the Vaccinated, whose aim is to help COVID-19 vaccine-injured people connect with support and find healing, instead of gaslighting and dismissal.

One thing that all speakers had in common was that they questioned the incessant COVID programming from very early on.

From the neuro-linguistic programming that nudged people to comply with stay-at-home orders — with isolation being a key component of the re-programming — to the "safe and effective" mantra that rolled out soon thereafter, many were already questioning government and public health objectives.

Speakers included (former) nurses Sarah Choujounian and Kristen Nagle from Canadian Frontline Nurses.

“For me, we’ve been talking about the same thing for the last three years; we know the harms, we know the narrative, we know what’s happened but what are we going to do about it and how are we going to move forward?” says Nagle.

“I was looking forward to talking about my journey in natural health, nutrition, plant medicine, how to make your own herbal first aid kits and home remedies to start shifting the focus to the things we can do at home and be more preventative.”

Choujounian says the focus now is on creating. “We’re here to share the new health paradigm that will connect communities to care. We don’t believe in the patient-care mentality, we believe that people are active participants [in their health].”

Vincent Gircys, retired OPP and forensic reconstructionist whose 32-year career depended on uncovering truth before drawing conclusions, spoke on the health of the justice system. “My contribution is on the health of our justice system, the health of our democracy, the health of sovereignty of the induvial and the country itself. I think it’s imperative that we talk about truth because without it we don’t have democracy and we don’t have justice” he says.

Epidemiologist and former Trump senior advisor Paul Elias Alexander reiterated how the government response caused more harm than good with faulty public health measures that were never based on science or evidence of efficacy.

Amanda Forbes, representing Children’s Health Defense Canada, discussed how her father suffered nine strokes after his second Pfizer injection. While she is no stranger to vaccine adverse events, having a daughter that was injured by routine childhood vaccines several years ago, she says that medical freedom is imperative.

Lawyer Michael Alexander, who represents various doctors facing reprimand from their regulator (the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario) for not following COVID-related recommendations, says that they are beginning to focus [legal] efforts on patients suffering from COVID injection harms in hopes of bringing it to the attention of the public.

The weekend wrapped with a showing of the documentary VAXXEDII and a list of additional speakers including those who have been injured by COVID-19 injections presented.

Original Canada post includes rumble embed

Canada #40 >>18313509

Ontario physicians still face limitations on their freedom of expression by their regulators

Despite the admission by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario that the regulations were in fact mere recommendations, all three doctors have been suspended from practicing medicine and could face additional punishment as hearings continue. Continue…

Lawyer Michael Alexander has received a decision from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) in regard to the three lawyers that he is representing who face disciplinary action by the same authority for various COVID-related contrarianism.

It did not go how he had hoped but rather, was to be expected.

The CPSO ruled that despite COVID restrictions being recommendations, prosecutions of dissident doctors will move forward with disciplinary hearings for Dr. Crystal Luchkiw, Dr. Mark Trozzi and Dr. Patrick Phillips.

"Why does Dr. Whitmore persist? Why do the college lawyers persist? Is it an order that she's taking from the government? Does she have stock in Big Pharma? Does her husband have stock in Big Pharma? Is she part of the globalist movement? What is her motivation? I'd like to know because it's not rational – not from the standpoint of the law," says Alexander.

In a press release, Alexander said that the “College failed to establish that the doctors had violated a standard of practice,” and has appealed the decision while bringing a motion forward where CPSO CEO and registrar Nancy Whitmore will be summoned as a witness.

The hearing will proceed on March 10 which will be broadcast publicly by the CPSO. "This time I'm hoping to get 3,400 people to the hearing room… because I want people to see how the College operates… I want people to see from the inside that this is a process that deserves to be scrutinized and there are some troubling questions that have to be raised around the way that the College conducts business," Alexander explains.

Alexander previously argued that there is no legal basis to investigate or reprimand the doctors being represented by him because the regulations were merely guidelines or recommendations, not legislated law.

Despite the admission by the CPSO that the regulations were in fact mere recommendations, all three doctors have been suspended from practicing medicine and could face additional punishment as hearings continue.

Dr. Phillips is being prosecuted for the crime of filing COVID-19 adverse events reports with his local medical officer of health, all of which were quashed before they could make it into the formal government run Canadian Adverse Events Following Immunization Surveillance System (CAEFISS).

Video: https://youtu.be/8KwDxuesu2c

More:

https://www.rebelnews.com/ontario_physicians_still_face_limitations_on_their_freedom_of_expression_by_their_regulators

Canada #40 >>18320962

Novel pharmaceutical products are driving variants and infections, warns epidemiologist

Citing a catastrophic public health response, Dr. Paul Elias Alexander says that if we want to end the roller coaster of infections and variants, we must immediately stop using emergency use authorized products.

By Tamara Ugolini | February 10, 2023

Seasoned epidemiologist and former Trump senior adviser Paul Elias Alexander recently reminded attendees at the two-day United Health Conference on February 4-5 that the COVID-19 public health response continues to be the real pandemic.

Alexander comes armed with extensive research knowledge in evidence-based medical best practices and a doctorate in research methodology and clinical epidemiology.

In this interview, he discusses how the novel injections must be stopped immediately due to instable and questionable mechanisms like pegylated lipid nanoparticles, and shares additional concerns with other emergency use authorized drugs like Paxlovid and Molnupivarvir.

The combination of ineffective injections and mutation-stimulating pharmaceuticals is driving variants, he says. Alexander reiterates his sentiments that children have robust, innate immunity and do not need these novel pharmaceutical products.

The COVID-19 public health fiasco has made Alexander further question all vaccines. He refers to the Dengue vaccine trial in the Philippines that killed children, the 10,000 children killed and maimed by a live-polio vaccine, and the RSV vaccine trial that resulted in two toddler deaths.

As all-cause mortality continues to skyrocket, with accelerations primarily in younger demographics, Alexander reiterates that the mass rollout of these novel products must be halted so that a real investigation can be done.

His sentiments remain that children have robust, innate immunity and absolutely do not need these novel pharmaceutical products.

Original Canada post includes Rumble video

https://www.rebelnews.com/epidemiologist_warns_that_novel_pharmaceutical_products_are_driving_variants_and_infections

Canada #40 >>18332146

Cases of Medical Incidents Reported by Military Pilots Increase by 1,700% More During Pandemic – Pentagon Blames it on COVID

The number of medical incidents among U.S. military pilots that prompted official reporting increased by more than 1,700% from 2019 to 2022, a phenomenon the Pentagon blames on COVID-19, Military.com reported.

The Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) reveals that the number of reportable medical events among military pilots increased from an average of 226 per year between 2016 and 2019 to 4,059 in 2022, as reported by Dr. Theresa M. Long, an Army flight surgeon.

According to Dr. Long, she decided to look into DMED after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) secretly widened the EKG parameter range for pilots.

Continued at source:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/02/cases-medical-incidents-reported-military-pilots-increase-1700-pandemic-pentagon-blames-covid/

Canada #40 >>18354138

WHO quietly abandons Covid-origin probe after China denies access to investigators

https://thepostmillennial.com/who-quietly-abandons-covid-origin-probe-after-china-denies-access-to-investigators

"The politics across the world of this really hampered progress on understanding the origins," Van Kerkhove said.

In 2021, the World Health Organization initiated Phase 1 of its investigation into the origins of COVID-19, sending a team of researchers to Wuhan, China, the epicentre of the outbreak.

The team of researchers outlined four potential outbreak scenarios in their initial report, the least likely of which was the lab leak hypothesis. After noting that it nonetheless had to be investigated as part of Phase 2, China refused to let them back in. As a result, the program has been quietly abandoned altogether.

According to Nature, following the release of the aforementioned report, the WHO sent a notice to member states going over how they planned on investigating all four potential outbreak scenarios. China flatly rejected the proposal, claiming that it made no sense to look into the lab leak hypothesis.

The most likely theory developed by the team of researchers that visited Wuhan in 2021 was that COVID-19 spread from bats to people, potentially via an intermediate species. China, though supportive of the theory over the lab leak hypothesis, still appeared reluctant to allow them to come back and test the notorious wet markets and the farms that supplied the products.

Without access to China, the WHO and its researchers were unable to get much further in their investigation. "Their hands are really tied," University of Saskatchewan virologist Angela Rasmussen said.

WHO epidemiologist Maria Van Kerkhove and National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratory Institute associate director Gerald Keusch suggested a changing political landscape caused the deterioration of relations between the team of researchers and China.

"The politics across the world of this really hampered progress on understanding the origins," Van Kerkhove said, with Keusch arguing that the situation was "poorly handled by the global community," including both China and the WHO.

According to Van Kerkhove, WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has attempted to mend relations with Chinese officials, and staff have contacted the China Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Beijing.

Van Kerkhove said the situation has led to "deep frustration" among all involved, adding, "We really, really want to be able to work with our colleagues" in China.

https://thepostmillennial.com/who-quietly-abandons-covid-origin-probe-after-china-denies-access-to-investigators