>>18377299 pb regarding “Active Surveillance” Over “Very Sensitive Military Sites”
This proves I was 100% correct about this threat.
This board has more power than you know - Q
And as a defensive measure, we have to consider the following to 100% correct too.
-
If they can turn the direction it travels (which they did) remotely then -it can receive data.
-
If it can receive data then -it can transmit data.
-
If it can send and receive data then -potentially hack our computers at facilities
-
If it can hack our computers at facilities then -it can alter our software
-
If it can it can alter our software -then it can control radiation leaks and control our monitoring and metrics systems, it could also control our targeting and geo-location systems, program our missiles to detonate on launch, or start a war for us.
This was a huge security violation with implications of thermo nuclear warfare.
We need to use a high altitude drone that has a refuel line that can inject the balloons with liquid nitrogen and then seal and drop the line. This will freeze the helium and sink it slowly.
>>18275287 Related Q team: EYES ON pb
>>18275298 Related Q team: EYES ON pb
>>18275312 Related Q team: EYES ON pb
>>18275323 Related Q team: EYES ON pb