I don't know much about photo rights, but when the 1st "China balloon" went overhead I noticed the photographer and looked up his Twitter. This link will get you to the original photo from him (I think its the original, anyway).

https://twitter.com/Stormchaser_TS/status/1621622839592853504

The photographer is a professional and it looks like from his account that he does work with storms and astrophotography, too. I get the impression his photo may have been the best obtained by people on the ground (at least outside of government).

I think looking at the original photo might give some idea whether or not the swiveling camera hypothesis has any merit.

>>18379002

Just started digging. Frontier Technology in Ohio checks out so far.

>>18379002

Spoopy.

https://www.fti-net.com/fti-ceo-president-and-chairman/

>>18379002

I actually think this is potentially notable if we can get a link to some sauce.

"Frontier Technology" in Ohio leads to an entity that seems to handle radioactive material and serves a bunch of US government entities.

>>18379095

Bingo.

https://www.thomasnet.com/profile/00697214/frontier-technology-corp.html

>>18379095

There is a location in Xenia. Related to radioactive isotope work. However, the company name is Thomasnet at that location. But if you search for Frontier Technology in Xenia you get to the Thomasnet information. Pretty spoopy stuff.

Even mentions the type A packaging. What the "heck" would this package be doing in Ukraine (if it is really there)? Would this be material being sent to a US lab?!

>>18379002

I could be wrong but I don't think it is necessarily "waste". Check out the Frontier Technology information.

>>18379135

>>18379134

Are these related?

>>18379002

Cap from Frontier Technology in Xenia Ohio seems to match container pic.

>>18379002

>https://t.me/s/europeandusanews

I don't have an account. The container pic appears legit to me. I have no idea if the cyrillic characters watermarking the image make it legit or not that it is in Ukraine. I can read "Odessa" (pretty obvious).

Guise,

This Frontier Technology company has some odd connections. DoD related unmistakably. So Frontier Technology leads to a headquarters in OH with "FTI" moniker. Frontier Technology specifically in Xenia, OH leads to Thomasnet and a picture that seems to be the same in the apparent Ukrainian picture.

Here are some interesting caps from this site: https://www.fti-net.com/capabilites/ https://www.fti-net.com

Hunsville Alabama has a new FTI site.

Odd observation: Earlier today I did a little dig on a company in my region that was ultimately owned by what appeared to be a multinational. This seems similar to the situation with Frontier Technology. Question: If we start digging on small "local" companies are we going to find that most or many are actually owned by big conglomerates or else tied to DoD, etc?

>>18379278

>Are they ultimately just more blackjack

That seems like a reasonable hypothesis.

>>18379120

The container label says non-fissile but radioactive. This suggests to me that the material is not going to a bomb. False flag possibilities or research?

"⚡️@mod_russia: Several containers with radioactive substances were delivered to 🇺🇦 from the territory of a European country.

❗️These containers will be used to stage local contamination of a region close to one of the radiation-hazardous facilities controlled by the Kiev regime"

https://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/unna/3332

Why NOAA?

>>18379287

>>18379296

Well we kinda have a "Uranium 1 type" dig going on atm. Care to join in? The Russians are saying radioactive material was sent to Ukraine via a European nation. Seems there is a drum with US labelling. The labelling leads to a US corporate entity/ies that is DoD connected and works with radioactive materials. Russian claims that a FF is/was planned make sense, but other options exist.

>>18379333

>dirty bomb does not require fissile

So it just spreads around some radioactivity?

>>18379360

So if the pictured material showed up in Ukraine it could be used to make a dirty bomb. I wouldn't know if the Russian claim is correct or not, but the label on the product pictured appears genuine. Meaning that if the provenance of the drum is accurate the US (Biden regime) has some more 'splainin' to do, imo.

>>18379365

Tyvm.

Now I see what Thomasnet is.

There is a description and short video of what Frontier Technology does.

https://www.thomasnet.com/profile/00697214/frontier-technology-corp.html

They make a neutron source.

>>18379368

>Fissile nuclides do not have a 100% chance of undergoing fission on absorption of a neutron

It looks like the drum possibly identified by Russians in Ukraine may be a neutron source.