Anonymous ID: 797398 Feb. 20, 2023, 9:32 a.m. No.18382479   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2488 >>2576

>>18382464

> osmium

elemental osmium is fairly reactive in air, forming an incredibly toxic heavy-metal salt, osmium-tetroxide.

Most meteors don't have any metals at all in them, and the ones that do primarily contain iron.

Anonymous ID: 797398 Feb. 20, 2023, 9:42 a.m. No.18382547   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>18382523

> all he has to do is set up a way for people to send him money and there is a new thing automatically

Yep, which is why I think the whole thing is a 4D chess move. The original organization, Project Veritas, can fold up and the people funding it can disappear. But O'Keefe can go on, build a new funding mechanism that's moar anonymous, and the people who were behind Veritas from the beginning can resume their funding via the new system. They an smurf donations to O'Keefe just like bribes are funneled to politicians. Use "crowdsourcing" to act as a cutout.

Anonymous ID: 797398 Feb. 20, 2023, 10:08 a.m. No.18382689   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2718

>>18382623

> James O'Keefe is worthy of a Pulitzer and Nobel prize.

> he is ON SOCIAL MEDIA, not msdnc

Also astute observations.

He is part of [the machine]. If he's virtuous, maybe we can save him. But if he has some dark shit in his closet, then he hangs with the rest of them.

Anonymous ID: 797398 Feb. 20, 2023, 10:19 a.m. No.18382742   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2752 >>2878

>>18382718

> Didn't read

Anon, you're right to point-out that O'Keefe is not part of some big network, now. He used to work at one of them though, I can't recall which. So, yeah, he is part of the establishment. But he's also trying to break out of it.

We don't really know what's going on, or who is being controlled, or who is really on "our' side. But most of O'Keefe does is harmful to the establishment's goals, so it makes sense to continue supporting him. The jury is still out on the Veritas board though, but I'm hoping their treatment of O'Keefe is some kind of 4D chess move.