Anonymous ID: 830d10 Feb. 20, 2023, 9:57 a.m. No.18382623   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2644 >>2689 >>2706

>>18382575

James O'Keefe is worthy of a Pulitzer and Nobel prize.

 

Your attacks are clearly designed to

>cast doubt on the information.

You're presuming to be 'observing' that, when in reality you're introducing that very narrative.

Try again.

>James O'Keefe would have never got airtime if he wasn't a clown

He is blacklisted, fake news is ignoring what he is releasing. He is not 'given' airtime, he is ON SOCIAL MEDIA, not msdnc.

>>18382580

>Astute observation

It's not even true.

Anonymous ID: 830d10 Feb. 20, 2023, 10:12 a.m. No.18382718   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2742

>>18382689

>>18382682

>>18382644

>Nobody gets the airtime James did without being controlled.

See the main problem with being a low IQ shill is they have no clue that what they're lying about is open source and can easily be confirmed by Anon.

 

LOOK AT ALL THOSE FAKE NEWS LINKS TO PV's PFIZER VIDEO.

 

"nOboDy gEtS tHe AiRTiMe JaMeS DiD"

 

KMAO!

Anonymous ID: 830d10 Feb. 20, 2023, 10:21 a.m. No.18382752   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2826

>>18382644

And another thing. In2023, since WE control the news now, you cannot 'historically' depend on a positive correlation between 'airtime' and 'controlled'[by_clowns].

The correlation is now:

quantity of 'airtime' = quantity of 'news' higher probability of TRUTH.

 

The world doesn't 'work' the way you say it does.

>>18382742

>Didn't read

>Yet replies indicating it was read and TRIGGERED the shills spewing disinformation.

It's over you failed.

Anonymous ID: 830d10 Feb. 20, 2023, 10:22 a.m. No.18382759   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2773

James O Keefe should now find the sexiest undercover reporters he can find and have them honeypot Project Veritas in his ultimate act of revenge.