ty, baker
> founding principles
The US Corporation was founded by a bunch of cabalists, who had as [their] goal the creation of a "new Europe." They wanted to start wars and profit from division in the New World just as [they] had in the old. So, yeah, the "vision" of the founders is achieved by breaking up the US into a bunch of conflicting states.
> each state was essentially it's own "country"
Strength through unity.
Breaking up the US into a bunch of smaller entities is dumb. One people, united in defense, is very hard to defeat.
> supposed to be 50 shades of grey in there as well
So, all kinds of evil? No thanks. I'd rather have one big assed military union that exists only to protect the citizens. You know, the thing we were promised but never delivered. Actual protection for our lives, liberty and property. Anything else is a grift.
> The United States were already their own entities
The united States [sic] were their own entities once, prior to the Constitution. And while it's entertaining to argue that we should return the rule of North America to a pre-Constitutional state, it's sub-optimal.
Don't get me wrong, I once thought that a de-Federalized union was the way to go, but it lack the unity of command. For the united States [sic] to survive against all others, it must have a singular command structure. One Commander In Chief. And lots of little principalities can't accomplish that.
Administratively, yes, everything should be broken-up as much as the participants desire. But the American fighting man is to have one CIC. The consolidation of power under a single Commander, a President, has benefits that outweigh those of a more distributed system.
> unsatisfied with the concept of liberty and free will
That is not at all my position. Liberty and the exercise of free will are the goals. But you can't put the cart before the horse.
Liberty and free will can only be exercised if they are protected, and that can't be done by a weaklings. Strength, the use of force, is necessary to defend liberty and peace. The use of force must be consolidated for the purposes of protecting liberty and free will. And so, a compromise must be reached. That is, the contents of the cart may be important, but they can't come before the horse.
Volunteers. The solution is volunteers.
> well armed citizens
> standing army
Depending on your definitions, they're the same. Volunteers who reliably show up for duty count as both "well armed citizens" and a "standing army."
Organized appropriately, citizen volunteers can form the backbone of a huge and immensely powerful military.
Their capabilities can also be augmented by the issuance of letters of marque - privateers who fight for profit. Got a problem with pirates or drug cartels operating outside of domestic territories? Issue letters of marque.
> Had time to watch it
He makes it pretty clear that he was bushwhacked by the board, and that the timing with the Pfizer video is 100% suspect.
I guess my first, totally uninformed hunch was correct - the Project Veritas Board is comp'd.