TYB
>Didn't even use the clutch
>22-380 BRUNSON, RALAND J. V. ADAMS, ALMA S., ET AL.
find it odd that the case page has not been updated with DENIED but the image has changed again??
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
wheres planefag that caught the guard drawing the blossom? didnt cap unfortunately
appreciated anon - much love - no homo
changed againโฆhmmโฆ
>The image has something to do with the state of the case before the court, dug it, but came up empty.
that was my thought but beginning to think that may not be the case. anon has asked this several times, thinking with all the lawfag "EXPERTS" that have so much to say, would get an answer. that has not been the case YET
the image on the page