So I've read conflicting reports - anyone have clarity?

Tucker was 'given' the J6 video

Tucker was 'given access' to the J6 video

Two totally different things. Are his producer people in some room of the Capitol looking at video?

Sources informed Axios co-founder Mike Allen that Carlson’s team was in Washington, DC, last week going through some of the footage, and it will begin to roll out on Carlson’s programs in the forthcoming weeks.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/02/20/report-mccarthy-grants-tucker-carlson-access-41000-hours-january-6-video/

Wish our media would get this right. The "video footage" isn't at FoxNews HQ.

>>18391899

So tomorrow 8am EST the counter turns 1717

>>18391939

Do we know if anyone has offered to host it somewhere, accessible to the public?

41,000 hours is gonna be a big amount of data.

Doubt Congress would just host it on a .gov somewhere - they are all incompetant.

I heard DOJ had to stand up some kind of special servers & access for the video for all the J6 defendants and legal teams. Separate from Congress.

>>18392078

All the 'slow roll' of some of this news takes away the surprise factor.

We need some shock and awe.

Whoever came up with this - 'lets slow roll it with Tucker' and then dump the files will lose the element of surprise - just like the Twitter files.

Too damn slow.