>>18408139 (PB)
Roman History is too complex for a one sentence gloss about this topic.
board status is
an ongoing issue
and as the board is in maintenance
there are some quirks with the features.
the most notable is the time is not by the hour, and stuck on the two of the hour.
the same issues with attack-bot teams of fake-personas gang stalking anyone not on their team.
they pretend to be protecting Jim from Criticism and if you comment on things
they may just go into attack mode.
but the thing is they seem to be brand new
at this
and completely unaware of how things go on here in a typical way.
so it's best to lurk and realize that the
toxic sludge personas of the badger bots of the shill-kingdoms of mean
will be deployed against anyone not on their team who catches their eyes. (if they even have eyes.)
Jim is awesome and when I talk about issues
I'm not 'whining'. the is the word that shillbot used repeatively yesterday.
they cast all review, or sea-lane reporting here as if it's a disgruntled person who
is just lazey and not paying attention.
in fact I type this so that others can see it and not bother getting into a jousting match with board-personae who have the character
of that character from Monty Python
who keeps attacking even
when his
arms and legs are . . . well you all know the bit
if you're real.
other interesting stuff?
'checkum' is a thing from a number of years ago where a character in a meme has a pointer and points at a post number.
the new configuration of the board makes it so that
post numbers now have a line return at their start so that they always start off on the left of the post
so checkem memes all need to be reworked
or they won't point at a post number .
some anon reworked some memes last night to point in the new direction.
this is the 'rage against the coo-coo clock' persona.
it's a 'board persona' that pretends to be trying to root out all the 'board personas' but what it does, in effect, in make the anon
bored persons
who have to just scroll past this idiot has he
lashes out at anyone who posts
recognizable memes that seem to be of phame-phags.
I reviewed you in another post?
am I mistaken about you?
the 'illiminated manufactured personas' and 'seeth' narrative has been going on for days now
and it's more annoying than any of the coo-coo clock activity that you rage against every day.
but here you are praising my status report.
"It's just a flesh wound"
the very famous scene from . . .Monty Python and the Holy Grail"
Facebook and Meta are both
fatally wounded
Google and Microsoft
are untrusted
People openly mock the Potato-of the United States (of America).
are you not paying attention?
remember, anon, the persona against which you rage is what you say and any raging against it makes you behave as it does.
so it's best to note it, if you need to, as a marker for you and other anons, and not go into battle with it.
just a recommendation but you're on your own in how to proceed.
I do it all the time so I get it.
yes, you're right, I see no rage in your posts.
but constant-battle anti-shill is a tactic
with which I've had my arms
cut off in that arena (thankfully just an allegory)
I hear you.
good point, while most lurker here
already know most of these things, there could be newbies to the board who have no experience with it.
got it!
does it bug you that two real people are here watching you as you do your know-it-all bit here?
you could tame yourself and stop your bit . . .
but you don't.
and we notice it.
is that a problem.
Do we post about it because we are loving
but mistaken in thinking that you could learn?
a question
but you can learn, right?
so that's why
over time I've seen that you don't seem to learn. you parrot on with your operational lingo and I note it.
you now how much I type that I don't post?
it's a lot more than what I post, by the way.
so you could learn or maybe you can't learn.
if you can't you don't seem real.
Polly,
you chatter on but
you keep saying the same stuff
over and over
we've lopped off your (allegorical) arms and yet you say it's only a flesh wound.
if pepe is at the shore and
the view is from out on the water if you use the reflection on the surface of the lake you will get a check-em that points in the right direction, and pepe will still be holding his sword up which is what you intend, correct?
PS to all who want to drive everyone else away:
the tactic of saying anyone else with a point of view is a shill
doesn't work here.
the bait bot let's argue pointlessly with a constant parroted neighsaying.
am I supposed to say:
"your post is made up. There is nothing complicated about it?"
this malicious presence is also a tit-monger.