Anonymous ID: 669e61 June 20, 2018, 11:09 p.m. No.1843183   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3205

06-19-18

 

6.

 

Define INVASION.

Does the foisting of helpless children by the parents, into the hands of the people of a good Christian nation, amount to a crime being committed by the good people of the US who attempt to protect the children who were abandoned by their own parents?

Why do the parents of these children do this? Is this a long-term strategy of their parents to criminally enter the United States? By foisting their children upon the good people of the US?

Who is to blame for the separation of children from their parents in this particular situation?

The government of the US?

The people of the US?

The parents of the children abandoned by those same parents?

Define hypocrisy.

Define monkey mind.

Define “so dumb, they are confused by macaroni and cheese.”

If Mexicans line up human catapult machines all along their side of the border, and they begin catapulting themselves over the border, knowing that they have a 90% chance of death by doing so, who is responsible for the deaths of those people?

Who will pay to treat the injuries of the survivors?

Should the survivors automatically be granted asylum, since the level of bravery required of a Mexican to agree to be catapulted over the border is beyond the comprehension of spoiled Americans?

If someone wants US residency THAT bad, shouldn’t we just give that person legal residency, if he survived the catapult?

What if the parents of these abandoned children were to have catapulted their children across the border instead of dropping them off?

Who would be responsible for the deaths of those children?

Donald Trump?

Obama?

Nieto?

The stupid Mexican parents who placed their own children in catapults and flung them over the border into the US?

List the most obvious character traits of a leftist, such as a US Democrat.

Define refusal to accept personal responsibility.

Define hypocrisy.

Define INVASION.

 

V

Anonymous ID: 669e61 June 20, 2018, 11:09 p.m. No.1843193   🗄️.is 🔗kun

From 8Chan: “Is it possible that ES and goog had a private mail server set up in NK for the cabal so that there was no possible way any intel org could access the physical server? He was there twice it seems. Perhaps there were 2 server and two networks. (Perhaps completely off the general internet) Very ingenious if true.”

 

Here are my thoughts: What was this massive build-up of saber-rattling on the part of Kim and Trump? What was its origin? Kim’s missile tests? Was that it? Why? Because it was provocative? Why was it provocative? Why did Kim do it? What came first, the chicken or the egg?

 

Well, how about this little melody taken from Fantasia: Trump calls Kim upon being elected, and tells Kim, “Hi Kim, I think you are a little fat boy, and, by the way, you have a Google Email Server over there, and I want it. Or, at least a copy of the entire contents of that server, and I want it NOW.”

 

Kim says, “Ruck no, Ronard Rump! If I do that, the Cabal will nuke me out of existence! You don’t understand, Ronard Rump, my entire country will cease to exist! Love ya! Mean it!”

 

Trump says, “Listen fatboy, I can bomb you out of existence, too! Do what I tell you to do, or you get a spanking!”

 

Kim says, “Fire Missers!!” and tests his missiles in order to threaten South Korea and Japan. Then Kim says, “Prease Ronard Rump! Don’t make me commit suicide!!”

 

Ronald Rump says, “Send over the Fifth Fleet!”

 

Kim say “Ruh Roh! Ronard Rump gonna kirr me!! Think fast!!”

 

Ronald Rump says, “Tell you what, Kim. You give me that server, and I will guarantee your safety with my Fifth Fleet, right next to you, and NO ONE will mess with you. Promise, mean it.”

 

Kim say “Ok Ronard Rump, you win. Also, we make deal to unify with South Korea. We want better life! Get CIA outta my country!!”

 

Rump says, “That’s a deal, Kim! So, here’s what we’re gonna do now: we are going to have a big, fake, drawn out public fight, and it will look like we are about to go to war. That will get the Cabal very comfortable, thinking that they still control you. That’s when we will move in, take them out, grab the server and free you and your people, and finally allow North and South to reunify and be one Korea once again. That’s what everyone has wanted all along.”

 

Kim say “Ronard Rump, you get Nobel Peace Prize!”

 

Then, they had their secret meeting back during Trump’s Asia tour, cut the deal, and then had a big fake public fight, and everything else, and now here we are. Kim is free. North Korea is free. The world can check that massive pain in the ass off the list. Now we can move on to that other pain in the ass known as Iran. We are going to help make them Persia again. Bloodless coup. Relatively bloodless, anyway.

 

V

Anonymous ID: 669e61 June 20, 2018, 11:10 p.m. No.1843209   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>1740090

 

We must ALWAYS remember that the concept of all human life being of equivalent value is a construct of collectivism/socialism/communism. The idea that all men are created equal pertains only to the rights that all men possess equally. That does NOT mean that all people are created, or become, equally valuable.

 

The idea that Stalin's life was equally as valuable as the life of Putin, for example, is absurd on its face. Putin has done wonders for Russia and its people, and for that reason is getting 70% of the vote. Stalin oversaw the murder of tens of millions of his own people. How can those two men, of opposite qualities, values and accomplishments, where one is clearly good and the other is clearly evil, have lives that are of equal value?

 

Ayn Rand defined evil as anything that was "anti human life" (paraphrasing, not quoting, for all of you concerned Objectivists). That is a perfect definition for this discussion. How can someone who sets out to destroy human life, be of equivalent value to the other who sets out to improve the quality of human life?

 

Evil people must be killed so that the human race can achieve a higher quality of living. That is called "prosperity". "Prosperity" can be defined as "successful pursuit and attainment of happiness". To stand in the way of a man attempting to pursue happiness through strictly libertarian means is an act of evil and must be punished. When the people standing in the way are doing so in a massive conspiracy, and that conspiracy includes the wholesale murder, rape, and enslavement of the people, as well as the robbery of nearly everything the people own, we safely conclude that we have perfect justification for killing any single member of that conspiracy. OR ALL OF THEM.

 

We are living under the Law of the Jungle: "Kill or be killed." It is time for us to wake up to that reality and take appropriate action.

 

Since it is axiomatic that to be human is to have a soul, and that any person walking around without a soul cannot possibly be human, we must therefore conclude that the soulless among us are nothing more than meat robots, sent to earth to destroy the good humans, all of whom possess souls. Who would ever object to the witnessing of the mass destruction of the meat robots, sent to earth to destroy us good humans, those with souls??

 

Evil must be killed. Evil life has no value. It is literally anti-life. It lives by the Law of the Jungle. It commands us to “kill or be killed.” Therefore, Evil must be killed.

 

Good People of the Earth, don’t fear the Reaper.

 

He’s not coming for you.

 

V