send your sons and daughters to Ukraine
>Wonder what type of juror would disregard the jury instructions/rules which were stated multiple times/days (and smoothed over kindly by the judge - complete with compliments.) Who wants to hazard a guess?
did one of them ignore instructions already?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11812225/UKs-child-Covid-victim-wouldnt-died-breathing-tube-correctly-coroner-says.htm
Britain's first child Covid victim, 13, would not have died if doctors had placed breathing tube correctly, coroner says
Ismail Mohamed Abdulwahab, of Brixton, south London, died in March 2020
An endotracheal tube to help him breathe was found to be in the wrong position
By DANYA BAZARAA FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 07:48 EST, 2 March 2023
i remember what you are talking about, but didn't quite reach the same conclusion as you did.
but, i understand how one could reach your conclusion
>They did this shit everywhere, not just in Britain. Intentionally killing people with ventilators, or by simply neglecting them. All to make the plandemic seem real to people.
CPAC is on CSPAN
Harriet Hageman is pretty good.
She definitely has some nice turquoise.
>As a man …you have no ..no rights
no man has used the law in the way necessary to use parental rights.
You would first have to show that you don't have any responsibility for any child, ever.
You would have to go into in backwards so to speak.
It would not be easy and many would find it reprehensible, but it would be possible.
First..abortion rights for the woman establish that the fetal tissue, i.e., the baby, is a PART of the woman's body. No man has to pay or is responsible for someone else's body part.
Abortion rights give the woman sole right's to the body part because it must be that the part is hers and hers alone.
Then, establish that the woman's body part remains the woman's body part forever. At no time in the 'life' of the body part does a man or anybody have to pay for that body part. There is no logical reason for a body part of one ever to become the responsibility of another.
So, therefore, a man should never be responsible for raising a body part, even when the woman says it is his also.
but, if a man is made to be responsible for the body part, because it does become a child, then the man should have rights to that 'tissue' from the moment of conception.
That means, the man also would have the right to get rid of the body part, abort it, giving the man the same right as the woman.
Also, the man would have the right to keep the body part….let it be born and raise it.
not sure what you meant to convey, but these guys are not the same guy.
totally different.
not sure what your point is anyway.
That alex jones is a clown? could be…but who cares
>Hicks/Jones schtick is all just done to "pied piper" the
who cares? and what does it matter?
>go back to INFO WHORES
what's the problem with that?
I listen to Fox and Cnn and all fakenews, who I know is my enemey.
What's wrong with listening to one more?
Did Alex Jones screw you wife or something because you have a huge chip on your shoulder.