>>1844141

>We've talked about this before, about autists being "not hypnotizable,"

yeah was here for that. and also value these night shift topcis. it is a "long game" topic as there is little to be done to fix the underlying issues at the moment. how to best mitigate the essential stupidity of sheep and prevent further occurrences of what we have now is an issue that is going to have to be addressed at some point. either by smartening up the sheep or by removing their ability to take us with them as they walk off the cliff.

>>1844305

a bundle of sticks that cannot be broken….nice.

>>1844337

>I've had a theory for awhile that one of the reasons Q team came here was to demonstrate the value of the far edge of the bell curve as regards IQ and independent, selfless thinking: what was once the "noble," "aristorcratic," or "chivalrous" class. I know that will trigger the fuck out of people to hear at first, but sheep need shepherds, or the wolves devour them. And look at us here, sacrificing ourselves to save people we don't even know. It's built into the cake, a compulsion. The cabal has purposely sidelined us so we can't do our job, which is to identify dangers and aids for the benefit of our fellows. Thank God it didn't work.

Yeah this covers it pretty well. Though it is hard to see precisely how to drive a productive discussion of this. In my mind we will need something like a history of ideas that show when, how and where we went off the rails. One of the major hurdles is overcoming the particular brainshing that has been applied to much of the highly intelligent population. In big corp it goes: let's better ourselves by tapping our potential, defining what we want to achieve (professionally, leave the personal shit out of it, thanks - basically selfishness training). Step 2 is reward those that are good at being selfish monetarily and then rinse and repeat. voila, psychopath production line.

>>1844439

>P=NP. Proof me wrong

noone can prove you wrong as this is an open problem, perhaps the major open problem in mathematics. If your reasoning in favor of P=NP is not mathematical (if it is please provide said reasoning), then it must be philosophical (broadly speaking). You are welcome to reason how you will, but using P=NP as a premise in a broadly philosophical would lead me to doubt or at least seriously question any conclusions that might be drawn.

>>1844512

>weaboo

are you thinking Shinichi Mochizuki….if so will review and think it through…..

and if this is the thought, then my apologies anon, the doubts were potentially misplaced….

>>1844587

Taniyama–Shimura–Weil

so a connection between Wiles and Fermat and modularity and P=NP.

Never thought of it this way, but don't think less of you as a result.

>>1844621

>Welcome to Part 2 of the VQC! :D

saving the world with a side of number theory, what could be better?

>>1844715

>This makes me think even more that [RR] is on our side. By impeaching [RR], it forces all of Congress to show (by voting) Americans where their loyalty lies and what they're true agenda is.They put him in, hence the extremely high Senate conf vote, thinking this was their 'in' to keep POTUS from prosecuting bad actors & have "their guy"in control of the Russian Hoax/Mueller after neutering Sessions. [RR] might just be playing his role in this movie, keeping the Deep State confused, scrambling to figure out what's really going on…

It is one of the schrodinger's cat situations we have here. I hope you're correct but it is going to be a future proves past thing. A slippery creature like [RR] can only be judged at the very end of his role in the show - it may not yet be clear to [RR] himself which side he will fall on. Same thoughts apply to weasels in the senate like LG as well.

>>1844776

my particular autism when it is directed at numbers has been thinking through ways to replace Peano's successor relation with some other relation (Set of relations actually) that more richly describes the natural numbers. So breaking the naturals into classes based on the lowest prime factor and then:

calculating the relative density of the resulting classes in the naturals via the euler totient. This supplies all of the naturals, but lacks the resources to determine the position and hence the order.

Attempting to supply order via the geometric postion of each number inherent in it's prime factors when one of the powers of one (in this case the lowest) of the facors is allowed to be variable. So each member of the series generated by 2^n*3 (6, 12, 24, 48 …) has a fixed geometric position relative to 2^n; in this case at the midpoint between 2^n and 2^(n+1).

But clearly each and every prime factorization can be treated this way no matter how many prime factors are involved (proof would be via mathematical induction) so order can be given to the naturals via this route (it is really using doubling, tripling, quintupling and so on with the primes to generate the naturals instead of succession). The restant issue is that order is not basic, but is relative to the position of the base prime in the factorization (so 15, 45, 135…have their position fixed against 5^n numbers).

No maths background, just made this shit up thinking about Godel and Goldbach and as such may be nonsense and noise. Autism takes one to some strange ass places.