Q, why has the Bush crime family only been mentioned twice? I was raised a Democrat and ignored the contradictions in their platform until Ron Paul came around. I think most of us can agree the Bush-led faction of the cabal, the neoconservatives, were responsible for our wars in the Middle East and a number of our problems over the years.

While your attacks on the democrats are justified as the majority of the cabal agents are clearly in the Democratic party, you alienate middle-leaning Democrats by focusing almost all of your attacks on them. You mention that there is corruption on both sides, but I’ve been following since the beginning and the only times I remember you targeting a republican is the attacks on No Name, and regardless of what he’s done he’s seen as a war hero by most of the population.

Its not good optics if you want to appeal to both sides, and it will not have an impact on this sharply polarized political atmosphere. You are only reinforcing political views not changing them, and giving the MSM a reason to call this a far-right, cult-like movement.

If you truly want to change the political environment and prepare normies for the arrests you need to at least attempt to appeal to moderate Democrats, and you can’t do this just focusing on the faults of the Democratic Party. You need to give us some dirt on the Bushes and the Republican Party if you want people to truly believe this is not a partisan movement. This is the only way you can prove to people this movement is about good vs. evil and not right vs. left.