>>18441423 PB, and before
Regarding Dr. Mcculough and the spike protein and nattokinase 'cure'
While I am a big fan of Dr. Peter Mcculough, I don’t think this is the whole picture here.
Different things were in different batches. Different groups of scientists in several countries have documented this, for example the German group and Ricardo Delgado’s group. Different scientists and others have done very impressive work to piece together the evolving big picture, such as Dr Dr Ana Mihalcea, Karen Kingston, and science journalists like Mike Adams of Natural News and the indefatigable Rhoda Wilson of expose-news.com, amongst many others.
There seem to be 2 distinct schools of reputable thought here, that, also, do not seem to agree with each other, but both with much impressive work behind them. One may be called Spike-protein-centric, and the other could be called Graphene oxide-centric.
Dr. McCulough is looking to be on the Spike-protein-centric side of things, and he seems late to the party here, and maybe not seeing the whole picture. Many others have written extensively about spike protein detoxification over the last year or more. Attached is an example that some here may remember from over a year ago. Generally, the problem is best attacked from several different directions at once. Unless he has fantastic evidence that I have not seen or heard of, his fondness for nattokinase, OR RELATED PEPTIDES, is a magical silver bullet, it looks like he is demonstrating modern medicine’s fondness for silver bullets, even when those bullets aren’t everything hoped for, in reality. That said, nattokinase, or related peptides seem to be an excellent adjunct to most protocols. Keep in mind taking on an empty stomach is critical, as well as nothing else for maybe 2 hours afterwards, and these peptides are not cheap, and some, like serrapeptase, some people have serious issues with, and some like lumbrokinase, which is the most powerful of the easily available ones, is more expensive than most. These peptides are pretty safe for most people and can do some amazing things beyond spike protein remediation, as they eat old scar tissue inside the body and out, and also some of the junk in hearts and blood vessels, at a molecular level.
That being said, there is also a large, and strong body of evidence, spanning many scientists over many countries, working both together and independently, that have come to the strong conclusion that graphene oxide is the central culprit here, and the rabbit hole is deep. Attached also here, is another protocol from a few months ago, that some here may also remember.
One thing that is known well from several discreet bodies of evidence is that not all the vials of vaccines contain the same things. So, the idea that the spike-protein-centric school of thought AS WELL AS the graphene oxide, or GO, centric school of though ARE BOTH CORRECT, is not unreasonable.
Treating with a variety of modalities, especially those modalities generally regarded to be very, very safe is something to very seriously consider. One might consider treating GO for a month and then spike protein for a month. Some treatments overlap. Educate yourself and make the best decisions for yourself you can.